House Democrats Flex New Majority

Among 2013 House rule changes, NH Democrats end a committee popular among GOP.

Democrats in the New Hampshire House of Representatives flexed their new majority strength on Jan. 2, nixing the Committee for Redress of Grievances, a panel popular among Republicans.

The House voted 226-147 to amend part of its 2013 rules, eliminating the committee.

Rep. Daniel Tamburello (R-Londonderry) was among those trying to keep the panel, calling it a constitutionally created mechanism to help people redress grievances.

Rep. Robert Willette (R-Milford) also spoke in favor of it. He served as vice chairman of the Committee for Redress in the previous legislative session. Willette noted, from the committee's existence in the previous session, that every petitioner coming before the committee had to propose a legislative action or the petition wasn't entertained.

Rep. Pamela Tucker (R-Greenland) said the process "gave a voice to the people."

Moving for the rule change, Rep. Gary Richardson (D-Hopkinton) said the New Hampshire House is one of the most representative bodies, and any outstanding or pressing issue could be raised via legislation, on a case-by-case basis.

Other Democrats were more blunt.

Rep. Peter Sullivan (D-Manchester) tweeted, "The Redress Committee is nothing more than a way for crack pots to re-litigate issues before an unqualified kangaroo court."

Here is the full wording of the old rule (Rule 18), according to the New Hampshire House of Representatives website:

It shall be the duty of the Committee for Redress of Grievances to consider petitions for the redress of grievances submitted to the House pursuant to Part I, Articles 31 and 32 of the New Hampshire Constitution. All petitions for redress of grievances to the House must be submitted by a member of the House, and clearly and succinctly state the grievance and a proposed legislative remedy. After hearing from the member sponsoring the petition, it shall be the duty of the committee chair to determine if any petition is the proper subject of a public hearing and to limit hearings as appropriate.

David Campbell January 02, 2013 at 08:03 PM
of course they did.. they are gods, they are right, they don't car what the people think.. so just PAY MORE TAXES, LIVE IN WORSE CONDITIONS, and have them approve more laws PROTECTING SEXUAL PERVERTS AND THOSE WHO KILL THEIR UNBORN, while they tale your guns rights away and shut up already.. Oh and don't tell them their emperor OBAMA is a babbling fool.. they don't like that
Reality Geezer January 03, 2013 at 02:44 PM
Hopefully, we can get back to some logic and science when making new laws. The state is still emerging from the 17th century way of life.................
Atlant January 03, 2013 at 03:50 PM
You know that mental health care *IS* available in this state, right? You don't have to live like this.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »