patching...
Breaking: Terrorist Tamerlan Tsarnaev Listed on No More Names Gun Victims List »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Mitt Romney Vacationing in NH This Week

His entire family will gather at Romney's lakefront compound in Wolfeboro.

 

Mitt Romney will spend the Fourth of July week vacationing in New Hampshire, according to a Washington Post story.

In a lengthy feature printed on Sunday, the newspaper said Romney and about 30 members of his family will be at the GOP presidential candidate's $8 million lakefront compound in Wolfeboro all week. While there, they'll participate in an annual competition including various sports and games that has been dubbed "the Romney Olympics."

Apparently, there are also nightly family meetings, a "chore wheel" to be sure everyone is doing their fair share, and a family picture with all of the grandchildren.

Word is Romney will march in the Wolfeboro Fourth of July parade on Wednesday, though it isn't clear if he'll make any other campaign appearances. The campaign said a rumor that he was going to march in the Merrimack Fourth of July parade was untrue.

According to ABC News, Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-NH, will march with Romney in the Wolfeboro parade. Ayotte is one of several people reportedly under consideration to be Romney's running mate.

Related Topics: Fourth of July 12 and Mitt Romney

Dennis Taylor

10:15 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

We need to increase the property taxes on the estates in NH so that the owners, rather than wasting time with games in settings the rest of us will never visit--unless to clean, cook, or do the lawn--would need to get second jobs to pay for their wasteful opulence. The Romneys own more than their fair share of America, but pay a pittance in taxes as a percentage of their income. What's more, they seem to feel they have a right to the office of the presidency as well as their massive incomes and estates. I cannot see that they have anything in common with the mortals here in NH and should be legally excluded from running for office. The Romneys have no conception of real life and should not deign to rule others they can never understand.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andrew M. Zuba

11:24 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

I am pretty jaded but you sound like you're simply jealous of their success. Tax the rich, blah, blah, blah. They own more than their fair share? Please. Sounds like good old fashioned Communism to me.

Comment_arrow

Rosemarie Rung

11:36 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

Frances, please don't embarrass yourself with ignorant statements. First off, Romney grew up in a very privileged family. His father, George, was the head of American Motors and governor of Michigan! That's a far cry from the humble childhood of President Obama and his wife.

Comment_arrow

Judith Hogan

12:46 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Dennis, "... rule others..." Do we live in a kingdom?

Comment_arrow

A. Seymour

11:59 am on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Dennis, are you better off today then you were 4 years ago...!!!! Don't be so jealous of success.. we all want it except you... face it and 23 million Americans that are unemployed or underemployed. We need jobs, jobs, jobs. and can you offer any? - I don't need food stamps or ebt cards, welfare we just need jobs. New Hampshire loves ROMNEY---

Rosemarie Rung

11:01 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

I hear Romney will be walking in the Merrimack Fourth of July parade!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dennis Taylor

11:13 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

My son told me he saw Romney driving on 101. I corrected him to tell him that he saw Romney's driver driving Romney on 101. However, I do believe that Romney still prefers to do his own walking. I hope that he will give us another worthless speech about believing in America so much that we need to work the tax and employment laws to our financial advantage, even if that means outsourcing jobs overseas. I can't wait for the millionaire to look into my daughter's eyes and do a silent calculation of her cash value to his family!!!

Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

11:35 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

"Romney still prefers to do his own walking" That is funny

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Carolyn Dube

12:14 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

I've asked parade organizers and they have not heard this to be true. But we are checking into it further.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Carolyn Dube

12:25 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Confirmation from Romney's camp, he will not be walking in the Merrimack 4th of July parade.

Comment_arrow

Fred Wilson

6:51 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Rosemarie,he is not marching in the Merrimack parade. Stop embarrassing yourself by spreading dumb rumors.

Comment_arrow

Rosemarie Rung

8:12 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Fred, you are way behind the eight ball on this one. Read the several other comments before yours to see that this was already confirmed. Apparently, you don't like me very much, do you?

Dennis Taylor

11:11 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

I would also like to add that the Obama brood also has no conception of middle or lower class life. Why are we such idiots that we do not demand laws requiring the president to come from a family of average income and wealth? I believe that many of the readers of the Patch would love a scenario in which an average man or woman, backed by federal money and in a race in which only equal amounts of federal money could be used, would actually stand a chance of being elected. How wonderful it would be if there was a real chance for every child born in NH to be elected to the presidency. However, most of you would prefer to fawn over men a thousand times wealthier than you in the hope/false belief that they somehow know more about running the country than you do. We need income and asset limits for our leaders, as well as federal money only for elections, to help the rest of us have a chance at the high offices of the land.

Reply

Audrey

11:15 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

Dennis, that's a very interesting take on your view of who has a right to run for the office of Presidency. Does Mr. Obama have anything in common with either you or me ? Last time I looked he had a net worth of Millions and he along with his spouse in past years have earned more in one year than most of us earn in 10 or 20 years. So too say that Mr. Obama has a more legitimate right to the Presidency is absurd. Money has nothing to do with it, competency does and Mr. Obama has shown known of that quality in his 3+ years in the White House. There are more people on unemployment now than ever before, there are more people collecting Food Stamps than ever before, I can go on and on with the failed policies of this President but I'm sure enough has been said.
Hopefully come November, the country will act wisely and elect an alternative to Mr. Obama. It may be Mr. Romney or maybe some dark horse 3rd party candidate but one thing is for sure, OBAMA has to go !!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dennis Taylor

12:00 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Audrey:

Obama is a puppet of wealthier masters. My point is that you or I have zero chance of every even raising the money needed to compete for presidency. I believe that Obama is a fraud on many levels and also has no right to represent Americans. We are locked in a system that rewards the rich with political office all out of proportion to their numbers or their abilities. We do need an alternative to Obama and his name is Ron Paul. Yes, I am aware that the Koch brothers have funded much of the Tea Party and that is another example of what is wrong with our country. We have a rule of one person one vote, but the man/woman with the cash clearly can buy more than one vote worth of influence.

Comment_arrow

Dennis Taylor

12:14 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Audrey:

Can you point to one thing Obama has done that he did with his own money in the past three years? I recall being told by a guide in China how the emperor built the forbidden city. I wanted to ask he he did it all himself or did he have a concrete laying party with his in-laws. Give me an army of police, a printing press, and the support of the third of a country and I'll also do so many, many things.

Rosemarie Rung

11:27 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

Dennis, please please please READ and RESEARCH before you make idiotic statements. Obama grew up in a single parent home, VERY low to middle class and worked his way through to earn college admission and then onto law school. His wife grew up in a blue collar family, typical middle class, and like her husband, worked hard to go to college and law school. Isn't that the dream of every middle class family? That their children can go onto college and become successful? They certainly were not born with a silver spoon in their mouths and I'm sure they remember the struggles and sacrifices their parents made.

Reply
Comment_arrow

frances quinn

12:10 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

you mean obama grew up with a single white mother who according to his own books he wanted to disassociate from very early on and a black Muslim father and stepfather. now where are all the records of his earning college admission, student loans, etc. where did the money come from. read his own books and tell me.

Comment_arrow

Dennis Taylor

12:12 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

What is middle class about the family now? I can't recall the last time I spent 17 days on the beach in Kailua, can you? He went to Punahou Academy in Honolulu, a bastion for the wealthy. He somehow leaps from Occidental College to Ivy-League Columbia on someone else's dime.as well as affording a trip to Pakistan. I can't tell you how many poor students that I meet daily who tell me similar tales. Obama may be more of an average person than the Olympian Romney, but he spends like he is a god among us on his family, dog, and friends.

Comment_arrow

Judith Hogan

12:52 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Rosemarie, Can you say "affirmative action" in your quest of how they arrived at where they are at the present time? Have we ever seen college transcripts, LSAT scores, articles in the Harvard Law Review, etc.

Comment_arrow

David Victory

1:38 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

@ Judith

Affirmative action? Really? AA is the go-to for every racist when a successful minority is concerned. So I guess I imagined that President Obama was elected by the American people in a landslide. It was AA all along.

Dennis Taylor

12:20 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Andrew:

I believe that the current system of allocating the scarce resources like lakefront estates based on price is absurd. Why not have a lottery each year to rent such an estate for a fee that covered the upkeep of the estate and a profit for the state? As far as being jealous, I am not jealous of any one who earns his money without any fraud, dishonesty, or abuse of the law. Romney is guilty of all three, but his lawyers would disagree, and so, he is not. Rather, he is playing silly games on the shore of his estate and twirling a wheel to make sure he does his fair share--for his family. I take it that the rest of you, sitting in your houses and apartments--without the water view that you will never have, nor ever be allowed to see--are benefiting from this absurd situation? If so, how? Wouldn't you like a chance to live at his estate, even if only for a year, and even if you only made $40,000 per year. I guess the earth does not really belong to the meek, but to those who are good manipulators of the laws designed to govern the meek.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andrew M. Zuba

1:05 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

I already have access to a water view. It's called a public beach.

Patch_comments_icon

Marc Fortier

12:24 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Regarding the Romney to Merrimack rumors, the campaign has confirmed that he will NOT be marching in the Merrimack parade. I'm hearing he may be marching in the Wolfeboro parade, however.

Reply

Rosemarie Rung

1:05 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

I believe that many of you hate Obama and don't want to be confused with the facts, like he GRADUATED from Harvard and Columbia (by the way, degrees are not bestowed based on race or gender - he WORKED HARD for that achievement). I don't begrudge him the success that his degree enabled him to achieve. But, I'm sure you can't stand me either since I came from a middle class family, attended college with federal grants, loans, a scholarship and money from my part-time/summer jobs, and went on to a successful career. My education has enabled me to discern facts from fiction and not fall victim to the fear and anger that has consumed the ignorant right.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andrew M. Zuba

1:08 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

You had me until your last truly ignorant sentence. I would probably be considered conservative/libertarian yet I too voted for President Obama. Imagine that!

Andrew M. Zuba

1:09 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

I can't be bothered to watch the Independence Day fireworks so I have hired someone to watch them for me.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rosemarie Rung

1:18 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

The ignorant Right claims the health care bill will create "death panels," that it is a socialist system (hmm, that would be a single-payer system but I get to keep my private insurance), that Obama is a Muslim, that he was born in Kenya....you don't think these statement are ignorant???

David Victory

1:46 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Did Mitt bring a dog along for this vacation, too?

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/12/23/romney-on-irish-setter-strapped-to-car-roof-love-my-dog/

There is something wrong - on a fundamental level - with a person like that. Anyone have a dog? Look at your dog and ask yourself if you'd put him/her in a crate, tie it to the roof of your car, and go for a 12 hour drive. The dog Seamus may have lost control of its bowels during that torture, but Mitt is truly the "sick puppy".

Reply
Comment_arrow

Hilltopper

2:09 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

What about those walking brain donors that allow thier dog to ride, unsecured in the back of the pickup? I also have problems with people for crating their dog for lengthly plane rides in the cargo hold--however I find it a long stretch "on a fundamental level" to use dog ownership to judge a politician regardless of party

Comment_arrow

David Victory

2:49 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

@ Hilltopper

"I find it a long stretch "on a fundamental level" to use dog ownership to judge a politician regardless of party"

I'm not talking about dog ownership - I'm talking about animal cruelty. There's something wrong with Mitt Romney.

And I agree with you about dogs in the back of pickups - not a good idea, IMO.

Comment_arrow

Hilltopper

3:37 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

When is it "Animal Cruelty"? When one is charged criminally or when one feels because of personal beliefs, its animal cruelty, like going to the dog or horse track or even the circus? Some won't eat chicken or beef or wear fur? What about the pet owner that feeds their dog or cat unitl they look like bowling balls with paws? Were either of the Romneys charged? It seems alot of Americans meet your definition of having something "wrong" with them when it comes to animal ownership Mr. Victory

Comment_arrow

David Victory

3:50 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

@ Hilltopper

"When is it "Animal Cruelty"?"

When the dog gets sick all over the car on the car and he keeps driving. That's when.

Comment_arrow

Rusty

5:32 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Bill Clinton's dog Buddy got hit by a car after he and Hilary left the White House to live in New York. Bill opened the door, let the dog out, and he ran into the street.

Comment_arrow

Hilltopper

8:41 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Mr. Victory,

If the dog gets sick in the car and drives on it isn't animal cruelty?

Seems like, through your unapproval of the Romneys which is your right, you will use anything and everything to discredit them

Comment_arrow

David Victory

11:37 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012

@ Hill

"If the dog gets sick in the car and drives on it isn't animal cruelty?"

Really? Obviously if a dog gets sick in a car, one should pull over, let the dog out for air, take a break, and then let the dog back in once it's done purging, and continue to the destination. Not hose the feces off, put the dog back up on the roof and continue on a 12 - hour drive! You really don't think what Mitt did was cruel? How would you like a 12-hour trip on the roof of a car? How about a cold water bath after messing yourself and then back in the crate on the roof for you? There's something wrong with him. Apparently you take his side?

Comment_arrow

Hilltopper

11:50 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Mr. Victory,

As a dog owner, I wouldn't of transported my dog in that manner so I'm not taking his side. If his actions were against any laws in any state he was driving in, why wasn't he charged? What I'm saying is that it is quite apparent that your personal dislike for him is quite apparent and you will use any means to discredit him and his family no matter how far reaching--doing the same that you critizie others for

Can you disprove what Mr. Carty and Ms. Hogan has posted regarding dogs and their owners? Why is their statments BS and yours aren't? I won't hold my breath either

Comment_arrow

David Victory

12:53 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012

@ Hill

"If his actions were against any laws in any state he was driving in, why wasn't he charged?"

He'd have to be spotted and stopped first. He wasn't. If you commit a crime, and get away with it, have you NOT committed the crime? What kind of logic is that?

And you're right - I don't like Romney, and by highlighting his barbaric treatment of an Irish Setter I'm expressing one of many reasons WHY I don't like him. Is that so hard to understand?

Comment_arrow

Hilltopper

10:26 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012

Mr. Victory,

The way one treats a pet is crucial enough to judge one's competency for elected office??

By the way have you ever eaten beef, veal, or chicken? How about if you placed a bet on a horse or dog race? Maybe gone to the Circus? --- Many consider these as "barbaric"

I bet he pulled wings off a fly too--

Seamus Carty

1:54 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

David Victory, which is worse:

Reply

Seamus Carty

1:56 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

David Victory: which is worse - transporting a dog in a dog crate or eating a dog?

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Victory

2:39 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

@ Seamus

How predictable. To answer your question:

Transporting a dog in a crate for a 12 hour highway trip is far worse because Mitt was a grown man and decided there wasn't enough room in the Brady wagon for both the luggage AND the dog - so the dog lost. When the poor dog got sick and covered the car with feces, compassionate Governor Etch-A-Sketch robotically pulled over, hosed off the car, the dog, and took off again! Unbelievable.

President Obama was a small boy when he was fed the dog meat. It was hardly his idea.

Does cruelty to animals run in the RobMe family? Ann (the stay-at-5-homes mom) was accused of selling a sick, heavily mediacted horse.

"Dr. Soule’s toxicology report contained the following highly disturbing statement about the drugs:

In my 38 years of practice, I have never come across a drug screen such as this where the horse has been administered so many different medications at the same time."

Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/ann-romney-doped-up-horse-got-sued-too.html#ixzz1zUYbbF8G

Comment_arrow

Seamus Carty

11:02 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012

The dog was in specially designed crate, not a cage. He had made the trip many times and appeared to enjoy it. As for the feces, that happened once when the dog ate some turkey it was not supposed to eat.

Did Obama ever apologize for eating the dog?

Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

11:10 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012

An "Air tight" crate says Romney(must have had scuba gear on the dog).
It was still against the law in Massachusetts to do it.

I'm not sure if the dog Obama ate was tortured before it was served

Comment_arrow

News Flash

11:17 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012

The torture Healey is what Obama and the Democrats are doing to the the regular folks who make up 70% of the Population.

Comment_arrow

Hilltopper

12:55 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Mr. Healy,

If this trip was in the state of Massachusetts, which you stated by implying it was against the law to transport a canine in the manner the Romeny's did, the state is that big where one can drive for 12 hours or 6 hours each way and still remain in the state? Musta took the back road or the scenic route

Comment_arrow

David Victory

1:04 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012

@ Seamus
"The dog was in specially designed crate, not a cage. He had made the trip many times and appeared to enjoy it. As for the feces, that happened once when the dog ate some turkey it was not supposed to eat."

Ha ha! Sure, who wouldn't like to be on the roof of the car for a 12-hour ride? Where did you get this stuff? Sounds like something Mitt would say. Bad turkey? That about sums up him as a candidate:

"Romney ranked among the leaders throughout the Republican nomination campaign, but Republicans' lack of enthusiasm for him was evident in the number of times he shared or lost the lead. At various points in the campaign, Romney trailed or was tied with Rick Perry, Herman Cain, Newt Gingrich, and Santorum. Before the campaign got underway in earnest last spring, Romney also tied or trailed Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee, and Donald Trump, each of whom declined to run." http://www.gallup.com/poll/153839/Romney-Santorum-Santorum-Exits.aspx

Poor Mitt. Even Republicans can't stand him.

Comment_arrow

David Victory

1:09 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012

@ Mike

"An 'Air tight' crate says Romney(must have had scuba gear on the dog)."

Ha! Yes, I remember the bald faced "air tight" lie Willard told, too. Aside from asphyxiation, how did the poor dog's feces run all over the roof and windows of the car if the crate was "air tight". Governor RobMe is a terrible liar. And a terrible person.

Comment_arrow

David Victory

1:13 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012

@ Hill

"If this trip was in the state of Massachusetts, which you stated by implying it was against the law to transport a canine in the manner the Romeny's did, the state is that big where one can drive for 12 hours or 6 hours each way and still remain in the state?"

The trip was to Canada. http://www.forbes.com/sites/frederickallen/2012/02/01/did-romneys-dog-run-away-when-it-got-to-canada/

frances quinn

2:15 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

actually what amazes me is never mind eating dog, which obama did but that he smokes cigarettes and with all the anti smoke haters they would vote for him, let him near their babies, or be around him. the press really hides that one.....and did during the whole 2008 campaign. this whole dog crate on a roof thing is overblown...and yes i did have a wonderful dog!

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Victory

2:45 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

@ frances

1 in 5 adults in America smoke. It's a terrible habit, but it's his. Some reports say he's quit, but who knows? More importantly, who cares?

Comment_arrow

Judith Hogan

8:41 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012

The Obamas have a wonderful dog, too. I think his name is Beau. I also understand that they have hired a personal dog attendant for Beau that costs the taxpayer $106,000. per year for salary for the dog attendant. Perhaps Mitt should have hired a dog attendant for Seamus. Although Mitt would have had to pay for it out of pocket - whereas Obama pays for it out of taxpayer money.

Comment_arrow

David Victory

11:28 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012

@ Judith

If you don't have a link about that dog groomer, you're just spreading BS. Why do that? If you have legitimate information, share it. I won't hold my breath.

Comment_arrow

Judith Hogan

1:33 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012

David, I did not use the phrase "dog groomer". Those are your words. If you doubt that their is a dog attendant employed at the White House at a yearly salary of $106K I suggest you google it and it will be confirmed. I won't provide you with the link. You seem clever enough to do your own research. This has always been a well publicized matter. Do you think Barack and the girls walk the dog? Come on! A dose of reality, please!

Comment_arrow

Judith Hogan

1:44 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012

Ooops! I am wrong. The dog caretaker at the White House is paid a salary of $102,000. not $106,000. as I previously stated. Mea culpa!! Don't believe me - google it yourself, it is quite simple.

Comment_arrow

The Shill

3:30 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012

Judith I googled it and here are the true facts:
Dale Haney is the keeper of the White House grounds. In nearly 40 years of keeping the grass green and the flowers blooming, he's also managed to cultivate something just as important: relationships with the presidents' pooches.
Haney is often spotted walking Bo, the Obama family's Portuguese water dog. In fact, he's tended to every White House pup since King Timahoe, Richard Nixon's Irish setter.
Haney, 57, has been a White House fixture since 1972. After getting a degree in horticulture from Sandhills Community College in Pinehurst, N.C., he continued his training in Washington and basically was discovered for his green thumb, as he tells the story.
"They heard about me and they called me to come over here for an interview and I came and here I still am," he said during a tour of the gardens one recent rainy morning when first lady Michelle Obama - Bo's primary walker - was out of town.
That meant Haney would be Bo's handler until she returned from a day trip to Florida.
"I have him a little bit more" when she's traveling, said Haney, who said he's amazed by the public's fascination with White House pets.
This is not an Obama issue he has taken care of all Whitehouse dogs going back to Nixon and does more the just take care of the dogs next time get your facts straight but then again Republicans have never let the facts get in the way

Bob Samson

3:43 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

President Obama plans to start printing income tax forms on Kleenex, so that it will be easier for people to pay through the nose.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Victory

10:16 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

@ Bob

What's sad is that President Obama has CUT YOUR TAXES, and you have no idea about it.
HUNTERSVILLE, N.C. — What if a president cut Americans’ income taxes by $116 billion and nobody noticed? http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/19/us/politics/19taxes.html

People really need to change their media habits. Cable news and talk radio will lower your IQ.

To reiterate; PRESIDENT OBAMA LOWERED YOUR TAXES!!!!!!!
If you had any idea what was really going on you'd be thanking him instead of spreading BS.

http://www.rgj.com/article/20110421/NEWS20/110421053/Fact-checker-taxes-lower-under-Obama-than-under-Reagan-Clinton-

Educate yourself.

Bob Samson

3:46 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Q. Who should be listed as the most expensive dependent on your tax return?
A. President Obama.

Reply

Bob Samson

3:49 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

“Blessed are the young, for they shall inherit Obama’s national debt”.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Victory

3:56 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Bob, not only are you not funny, you're not right, either.

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Of all the falsehoods told about President Barack Obama, the biggest whopper is the one about his reckless spending spree.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/obama-spending-binge-never-happened-2012-05-22

What shape was America in when Bill Clinton handed the reigns to GWB? How much do you think a needless war and tax cuts for Thurston and Lovey added to the national debt?

Jan Schmidt

7:20 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Is this article really about Mitt's vacation?
Because I don't think too many people here know this - at least from their posts.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Judith Hogan

7:47 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

It began being about Mitt Romeny's vacation and it quickly evolved into class warfare - as usual.

Comment_arrow

Jan Schmidt

8:55 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

I would say it devolved....

Let's talk about the vacation of the candidate. I understand he's disrupting the area - and I had to laugh about it being called a vacation. Its not part of this article, but the whole family has to participate, is critiqued, every minute structured...

Not my idea of relaxation...

Comment_arrow

ForThePeople

9:39 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

By chance, have you seen the Vacation movies with Chevy Chase? It's exactly that, complete with the wheel of fun, every minute structured, and full of hijinks. Strapping a dog to the roof would be completely in character.

Comment_arrow

Hilltopper

8:51 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Ms, Schmidt,

"I understand he's disrupting the area" - Wolfeboro shoulda called Martha's Vineyard for pointers

"but the whole family has to participate, is critiqued, every minute structured..." sounds to me like a family tradition that a great deal of American families have--like Thaksgiving at Aunties' or Christmas with Grandma

Comment_arrow

News Flash

11:09 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012

I think Durham would have preferred Romney.

frances quinn

9:17 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

at least the taxpayers aren't paying for it....and it is not like he is going to hawaii or paris! what is wrong with mitt romney taking a vacation? i don't get it....

Reply
Comment_arrow

The Shill

1:03 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012

frances you are wrong as the GOP canadate Romney has a full secret service detail it costs the taxpayers the same amount to cover Romney when he travels as it does to cover Obama.

Comment_arrow

Judith Hogan

1:38 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012

From what I read in the newspaper this morning the locals in Wolfeboro were thrilled to have the Romenys there for a week's vacation. Many said it had been a family tradition for their family. I guess those who oppose families oppose family vacations, too. The Romneys did not require the extensive secret service equipment to be installed the way the Obamas have required while they vacationed at the Vineyard. Of, yes, of course, the property the Obamas rented the past two years from Mr Comcast has been sold to a Brit. Not available this year.

Jack Baillargeron

6:57 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012

Judith Hogan and Frances Quinn

Just to clarify, what the Shill says is incorrect, Romney has no protection from the Government SS. The secret service does not protect presidential Candidates, until the have been chosen after the Convention normally or for extenuating circumstances.

Obama was given it early by “Executive Order” from Bush, because of credible threats. It is normally 120 days before the election or around August. The Shill never gets it right lol. Probably will disbelieve the “Secret Service” it self lol.

http://www.secretservice.gov/protection.shtml

“Today, the Secret Service is authorized by law (18 United States Code § 3056) to protect:

Major presidential and vice presidential candidates and their spouses within 120 days of a general presidential election.

As defined in statute, the term "major presidential and vice presidential candidates" means those individuals identified as such by the Secretary of Homeland Security after consultation with an advisory committee consisting of the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the minority leader of the House of Representatives, the majority and minority leaders of the Senate, and one additional member selected by the other members of the committee.

Other individuals as designated per Executive Order of the President”

Reply
Comment_arrow

Judith Hogan

8:28 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012

Jack, ABC News reported on Jan 31, 2012 that Romney would begin receiving Secret Service protection.

Jack Baillargeron

9:12 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012

Thankyou for the correction.

I was not aware of that obviously lol. They must have had threats, though they never say that. But when you become the front runner I don't have a problem with it anyway, no matter who the canidate is, and lets face it, mormans have a problem with lot of people no diffrent then what Obama did, shamfully. But I would rather they err on the side of caution, and I could care less what it cost, security is what it is. Now nights on Broadway wife your wife, totally different lol We are not some third world country that changes with violence at the drop of a hat. ;-}

Reply

David Victory

11:55 pm on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

John McCain: Palin Was "Better Candidate" Than Romney
http://slatest.slate.com/posts/2012/07/17/john_mccain_on_sarah_palin_mitt_romney_he_picked_palin_because_she_was_better.html

He could have chosen Willard, but he actually thought Simple Sarah was a better candidate.

Reply

Leave a comment