Voter ID Bill Passes in NH, Governor May Veto It [VIDEO]
House, Senate pass bill that would require voters to present photo ID next year.
A bill requiring voters to show photo identification is heading to Gov. John Lynch's desk, where it could meet his veto pen.
The New Hampshire House and Senate both passed Senate Bill 289 on Wednesday. The House passed it 255-103. The Senate quickly followed, 17-6.
Republican supporters say it would go a long way to curb voter fraud in the state. Lynch, who said in his veto of a similar bill in 2011 that there is no voter fraud in the Granite State, has concerns with parts of the bill.
House Democratic Leader Terie Norelli, D-Portsmouth, called it a "voter suppression" bill. Other critics, such as the League of Women Voters-NH, have said it will unfairly affect the poor, the elderly and minorities in the state.
The final bill combines the Senate and House versions, with the Senate language designed to go in effect this fall. The stricter House language, which would go into effect in 2013, would require a voter without proper photo ID to sign a qualified voter affidavit and be photographed at the polls by an election official.
Speaking in support of the bill on the House floor Wednesday, state Rep. David Bates, R-Windham, told colleagues to pass the bill because Secretary of State Bill Gardner said he could "live with the bill."
Other speakers did not speak directly to whether or not voter fraud exists in New Hampshire, but rather to the perception that it exists. That perception was reinforced during the New Hampshire Presidential Primary on Jan. 10, when James O'Keefe and his Project Veritas engaged in undercover filming at various polling places, including some in Nashua.
New Hampshire is one of 19 states without a voter ID law, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, which tracked a surge in similar voter reforms in states in recent years.
The House version of the bill further excited critics because it would not recognize college IDs as a qualified form of ID in 2013. The photo ID requirements in the House bill would recognize:
- A driver's license issued by a state or the federal government.
- An ID card issued by the director of the state Division of Motor Vehicles, under RSA 260:21.
- A U.S. Armed Services ID card.
- A U.S. Passport
- And the qualified voter affidavit, as prescribed in the proposed law.
Voter ID bills have come up in previous legislative sessions. It became a priority this year for House Speaker William O'Brien, the Mont Vernon Republican who captured the gavel after 2010 with large Tea Party support. Sponsors of the 2012 bill include Sen. Russell Prescott, R-Kingston, and Deputy House Speaker Pamela Tucker, R-Greenland.
Timothy Harden
9:32 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Time for what the people want. Lynch don't veto.
If vetoed a good reason not to vote for a democrat Governor this November.
73% Think Photo ID Requirement Before Voting Does Not Discriminate
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/april_2012/73_think_photo_id_requirement_before_voting_does_not_discriminate
Latest Rasmussen poll bad news for Democrats
http://digitaljournal.com/article/323157
Democrats and Republicans Support a Voter ID-Check Law
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2011/06/10/poll-democrats-and-republicans-support-a-voter-id-check-law
Seamus Carty
9:47 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012
If Lynch vetoes this, he will decrease the prospects for every Democrat candidate in the state, particularly the governor position...
Just One Vote
11:18 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Cheers to everyone getting JUST ONE VOTE! Pass this bill into law!
Kevin Polley
12:49 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Please, Gov. Lynch - veto this bill! We already have a law on the books, 659:34, to prevent voter fraud. Any more than that will only impede NH citizens' civil rights.
Hilltopper
1:29 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Look on the bright side--you'll have a valid ID to use at any First Lady Book Signings you wish to attend
JIM
5:48 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
We have one law on the books to prevent voter fraud and the democrats say ..its enough. we have 20 thousand gun laws on the books and the democrats are trying to pass more every day, more hypocrisy from the left. Every time an illegal vote is cast it impedes my civil right to a fair and honest election.
ericlundgre@gmail.com
10:20 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
Protecting real votes from fraudulent ones is a critical government function. Everybody has the ability to secure one of the many, reasonable proof of identity available. Those who cannot secure one, the same amount of effort as voting, are not responsible enough to vote. Veto of this law is to support fraud and mass gatherings of the vulnerable who are influenced by political affiliations who force them to vote.
ForThePeople
10:25 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
Of the many freedoms humans enjoy, it's a logical fallacy to say "If you don't agree with me or my ideas, you don't deserve to ___."
People use the same phrase about literally every topic under the sun. Listen up, you don't get to decide who's deserving. It's a right given to the people, fought for by the people (did they all have ID?), and no political gymnastics are going to make this anything other than what it is: disenfranchisement.
Just One Vote
2:29 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
@FTP, so, ah, there is a right to bear arms too...... Does that mean "no one" gets to decide who gets a fire arm?
Sounds like you are advocating the reduction of gun control "Of the many freedoms humans enjoy, it's a logical fallacy to say "If you don't agree with me or my ideas, you don't deserve to ___.""
I'm telling ya FTP you and I are closer to the same page every day. :)
David Victory
4:47 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
@ eric
What "fraudulent vote"? There has been no real voter fraud to speak of. Election fraud happens though. I assume you're outraged as an American that these citizens (including 2 WWII vets) are having their voting rights stripped: http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/national/hispanics-democrats-biggest-groups-on-floridas-list-of-potential/1229860
The whole thing is rotten. Lower voter turnout always benefits the GOP. These voter ID bills are a scam. Some people DON'T have the necessary ID. Not a huge percentage of the population, granted, but some. This is just one piece of the plan. No fair minded person can argue that the acceptable IDs should be supplied to every single eligible voter FIRST, and THEN implement the requirements. And all the while the GOP is pushing this foolishness they're doing nothing to address unemployment, which is all they ever squawk about.
ForThePeople
7:02 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
If it's one thing you can count on, it's Republicans failing at logical equivalencies. Voting in the next president of the United States is not the same as the right to bear arms. I also should encourage you to add the following words whenever you say, "I have a right…"
Instead, "I have a right and a responsibility..." People always forget that second part.
JIM
6:22 am on Saturday, June 9, 2012
for the sheeple you have made our case , we the people have a right to vote and the govt has the responsibility of making sure all elections are free of fraud, if only on illegal voter casts a vote ,it is one to many, what part of this cant you and the rest of the loony left understand ? The only people who dont want voter ID are the ones who are committing voter fraud
Mike Healey
9:59 pm on Friday, June 15, 2012
Why are you so afraid to share your identity Jim? Is it because of all the stupid things you say?
Jan Schmidt
3:41 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
Unless every citizen is allowed to vote - we have become a banana republic, and lost our America.
Joel Price
3:57 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
If Michelle moron Obama demands a ID just to get into one of her crummy book signings then the entire country should DEMAND every voter show one....stop your bitchin...You have plenty of time to get one before November...If you dont then your more of a idiot than Obama is!
David Victory
4:31 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
@ Joel
Are you capable of simply making a post without calling anybody a name? Grow up.
And as far as our president being an "idiot", I'd confidently bet the farm he's smarter than you. He graduated magna cum laude from what is arguably the finest school in the nation. President of the Harvard Law Review. Professor of constitutional law. Yeah, what a dummy. Take issue with his policies if you want, but calling him an idiot is, well, idiotic.
Btw - The First Lady is no dope, either. Hate her if you want. You have your own reasons for that.
JIM
6:41 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
how do we know the fraud obama graduated magna cum laude ? he has never released his college records or any records for that matter He has posted a fraudulent BC on a govt web site (a felony) and his selective service registration has been proven to be forged and he has a stolen SS # from someone in Connecticut ,how can any one believe the rest of this frauds '' story ''
JIM
5:36 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
every illegal vote cancels out a legal vote. The only ones fighting this are the commiecrats.... as usual. The true disenfranchised voters are those of us smart enough to see that there is voter fraud and because of the democrat obstructionists It very well could be our vote that is canceled out by an illegal voter casting a vote.
Mike Healey
11:21 pm on Thursday, June 14, 2012
Wouldn't every illegal vote cancel out another illegal vote for the other candidate?
It kinda solves itself.
JIM
5:37 am on Friday, June 15, 2012
Mike, congratulations !!!! you have won the dumbest post of the day award. Why are you lefty's so afraid of voter ID laws ?
Mark A. Buckawicki
7:19 am on Saturday, June 9, 2012
There seems to be a significant critical thinking vacancy here.
These should help, but only if you read and use the information.
> http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/659/02/
> http://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/fallacies/
Did you state a claim? You should support it with facts.
JIM
9:44 am on Saturday, June 9, 2012
Mark , your post on critical thinking is vacant of any facts one way or another on voter ID and voter fraud.
JIM
9:39 am on Friday, June 15, 2012
Steve, there is no proof that voter ID will suppress voter turnout of any one group of people. In fact polls show the majority of Americans support voter ID, this is another manufactured talking point by the left wing because with out the illegal vote they will lose more elections. This is why the left continually demonises the Tea Party ,your scared of what they represent smaller government and the constitution, both of which the left hate . By your way of lefty thinking, if a criminal commits a crime and if the crime is one that is not committed that often we should just let it go, forget about it , its no big deal right, I mean its just a little crime. As a LEGAL voter, I have a RIGHT to a fair and honest election you impede my right to this by bocking voter ID and insuring illegals can cast votes. It dont matter which party is doing it ...its illegal. DAAS
Jane Aitken
11:17 pm on Thursday, June 14, 2012
Taxpayers groups have been collecting evidence of FRAUD for years now even before O'Keefe demonstrated how it's done. There are other ways it's done too. But so far Lynch panders to the far left extremists who want to keep the status quo. I agree with Jan. When I go to the polling place, I should be allowed to vote, even if someone already used my name.
Mike Healey
11:24 pm on Thursday, June 14, 2012
What percentage of voter fraud is perpetrated by each party? 50%?
When are these "tax payer groups" going to lets the rest of us see all this "evidence" they have collected?
JIM
5:43 am on Friday, June 15, 2012
Any percentage is not acceptable one illegal vote is one to many. The evidence is there Mike, your good at coming up with facts, do some investigative home work.
JIM
10:49 am on Friday, June 15, 2012
Steve, there is no proof that voter ID will suppress voter turnout of any one group of people. In fact polls show the majority of Americans support voter ID, this is another manufactured talking point by the left wing because with out the illegal vote they will lose more elections. This is why the left continually demonises the Tea Party ,your scared of what they represent smaller government and the constitution, both of which the left hate . By your way of lefty thinking, if a criminal commits a crime and if the crime is one that is not committed that often we should just let it go, forget about it , its no big deal right, I mean its just a little crime. As a LEGAL voter, I have a RIGHT to a fair and honest election you impede my right to this by bocking voter ID and insuring illegals can cast votes. It dont matter which party is doing it ...its illegal. DAAS
Jan Schmidt
2:23 pm on Friday, June 15, 2012
Jim - did you ever hear of fake IDs?
Mike Healey
3:14 pm on Friday, June 15, 2012
Wouldn't these alleged illegal votes just cancel each other out?
JIM
7:16 pm on Friday, June 15, 2012
yes Jan I have heard of fake IDs , in fact every democrat I know has one ...or two
Mike Healey
9:53 pm on Friday, June 15, 2012
Poor Jim...
So overwhelmed with reality.
I can see why you hide your identity, suffering from such limited capacity.
JIM
9:41 am on Saturday, June 16, 2012
mike you dont strike me as being all that bright yourself with statements like ''wont each illegal vote from each party cancel the other out so the problem takes care of itself ''
Brian St. Onge
6:04 am on Friday, June 15, 2012
Only the democrats fear a voter ID bill. They need the votes of the entitlement minded illegals to help with their elections and reelections.
Timothy Harden
7:20 am on Friday, June 15, 2012
Democrats only see fear. If it doesn't exist they then create in their own minds. Otherwise they think nobody would listen to them. Not that anybody should listen to them in the first place. Basically it is a matter of growing up.
Steve From NH
8:07 am on Friday, June 15, 2012
Well yeah, because a voter ID bill suppresses the votes of those that would vote for democrats. O'Brien is on record as saying he doesn't want college students voting, because they are too liberal. I mean come on - this is an obvious attempt to make it harder for people that lean to the left to vote. What are we, stupid? The number of fraudulent votes is minimal. The Republicans keep trying to track down fraudulent votes, they never find any (well, 2).
On the other hand, aren't there a couple of NH Republican hacks in jail right now for jamming the phone banks of the NHDP a few years ago to suppress their Get Out The Vote operation?
The Republicans are incredibly hypocritical - especially ones like the Tea-Party controlled NH House. They are true patriots, according to them, the real Americans, upholders of the Constitution and all that is good about America and Americans. Until an American disagrees with them. Then, watch your rights go down the toilet.
"Liberty and Justice for all That Agree with Me, everyone else sit down and shut up".
ForThePeople
10:17 am on Friday, June 15, 2012
Steve,
I suspect you were joking when you were asking, "What are we, stupid?"
Actually, now that you mention it...
http://news.yahoo.com/low-iq-conservative-beliefs-linked-prejudice-180403506.html
Just One Vote
10:59 am on Friday, June 15, 2012
@FTP, there ya go trot forward "fact" from anything you read without even knowing the author, although typical from you FTP this is so out there it is funny. This author actually believes in "gaydar"; I mean come on. The author's qulifications to write such articles?
"massage therapist, interfaith minister, belly dance teacher, aspiring web designer and ESL teacher. Part of the year Stephanie lives in Tulum, Mexico where she writes books, tends to her tropical garden, plays with her 8 cats, and teaches and writes. Stephanie is available to lead workshops and trainings."
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2012/05/17/study-gaydar-may-actually-exist-aided-by-facial-cues/
http://www.yogapostureadjustments.com/about.html
Please try to bring credibility to your argument.
ForThePeople
11:13 am on Friday, June 15, 2012
http://pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/01/04/0956797611421206.abstract
She is a reporter reporting on somebody else's study, which I provided. I don't really care if you disagree with scientific discussions. I'm disappointed that you don't know how to click a link and access a study. I'm guessing you won't be able to read it either.
But oh well, since you requested it.
JIM
1:00 pm on Friday, June 15, 2012
for the sheeple, there you go again pushing your junk science. Have you ever noticed that you never see these ''scientific studies'' done that bash progressives ? Do you know why ? Well ,Its because conservative scientists are getting grants and are busy doing research to try to cure Aids and cancer and other diseases that inflict mankind ,while the progressive scientists are getting grant money and doing junk science research to prove conservatives are racists and have low IQs and hate gays ..... .... you really need to grow up kid .
ForThePeople
4:58 pm on Friday, June 15, 2012
Conservatives who don't like science? Wow there's a shocker.
Listen up Jim. The world has continually rejected willful ignorance. There will always be people like you dragging everyone else down with them, but there will also be people like me trying to move the world forward. You can't keep the world flat forever.
JIM
7:44 pm on Friday, June 15, 2012
for the sheeple, are you stupid or just off your meds ? where in my reply did I state I didn't like or believe in science ..nowhere. What I said was you continually push junk science, you know ,crap that's made up by nitwits like yourself. So you listen up son , you couldn't move yourself forward, never mind the world ,now go back to reading the national enquirer and leave this discussion to the adults
ForThePeople
10:25 pm on Friday, June 15, 2012
You can't pick and choose everything that you do like as science and everything that you don't as junk. Science isn't so fickle as to be subject to your whim. And the science here appears to be validated on patch. :-)
JIM
6:58 am on Saturday, June 16, 2012
for the sheeple junk science is junk science no matter how you spin it , in the last ''scientific research'' you posted it noted right in the article not to take their finding seriously and in this article it said the same thing , that there are so many variables that the finding are not conclusive, so dont push you BS research on me or the others. Its tabloid reading nothing more, made to make inferior people like yourself feel better knowing that somewhere in this big wide world there is someone just a little dumber than yourself.
Atlant Schmidt
8:07 am on Saturday, June 16, 2012
Strangely enough, the one case of voter fraud that has made the local news in the past few months was the case of O'Brien's son (who is a Republican). As you'll recall, O'Brien's son was registered to vote in one state while running as a candidate in another.
I guess that's how Republicans can be so sure there's voter fraud going on: it's happening in the Speaker's *OWN* house!
Donald Chagnon
10:48 am on Friday, June 15, 2012
You have to show an ID to cash a check, board a plane, get a prescription, join a sports league, leave the country, by beer, by cigarettes, legally receive government benefits and on and on, but it is against the poor to make them show one to vote?
Voter fraud in this country was first widely used in the USA by the Daly Administration in Chicago during the election of JFK. Democrats have perfected it over the years. One illegal voter is one more than is allowed by our law. The voter ID bill does not make it any more difficult to vote than it does to board a plane.
Governor Lynch should follow the will of the people and sign this into law.
JIM
2:08 pm on Friday, June 15, 2012
Attention NH voters who support Voter ID
Beginning on June 20, Grassfire officials will undertake their most challenging petition delivery in their 10 year history when we move to deliver tens of thousands of petitions calling for stricter voter ID laws to every state governor in the United States.
it is imperative that grassroots Americans living in New Hampshire make a powerful statement to the governor -- one that cannot be ignored.
However before our deliveries are slated to begin, we are still off our goal for New Hampshire, and are turning to NH voters for help.
this important petition calling for lawmakers to protect the integrity of our election process, we're asking you to help us reach, rally and mobilize grassroots voters living in New Hampshire.
Forward this message to your friends and family members today -- urging them to follow your lead in demanding more stringent Voter ID laws.
http://www.grassrootsaction.com/r.asp?U=102159&CID=230&RID=35304222
Jan Schmidt
2:25 pm on Friday, June 15, 2012
Explain to me why you aren't demanding every citizen receive voter ID before instituting strict ID laws...
Come on Jim... explain why.
Just One Vote
3:04 pm on Friday, June 15, 2012
@Jan the same reason the Dems aren't demanding we secure the boarder before granting amnesty to criminals. The hypocrisy of your argument in comical. But to entertain you, how about this go get one now, you have got plenty of time before the elections. Every law abiding citizen has access to government photo ID right now, you need ID to register in the first place, so why the problem coughing it up when it comes time to vote? (Makes it tough for dead people to vote? tougher for people to vote twice?) I just like every other legal citizen has a right to a vote and have that vote counted, the prospect that someone can easily dilute my right to vote by gaming the system is absolutely unacceptable. It is offensive that you or any other wayward soul would look to mitigate a legitimate vote by even allowing the prospect of an illegitimate vote to enter into the system. No Jan why don't you tell me why NH is one of only 19 out of 50 sates that has zero voter identification law? That is a minority among states and according to polling a majority of NH citizens want some sort of identification to vote. If Lynch vetoes this it is a shameful day of partisan politics; shameful indeed.
Just One Vote
3:15 pm on Friday, June 15, 2012
@JIM, signed; and since it did not require ID I signed for Jan Schmidt too. :)
JIM
3:47 pm on Friday, June 15, 2012
you know Jan we need an ID to do most every thing today, go to register your dog you need an ID, your argument is absurd, its just another far left squawking point lets see, we got the
war on women
the war on blacks
war on Latinos
war on gays
war on the poor
war on the rich
war on the middle class
war on illegals ....and NOW ........ DRUM ROLL TATATATATATAATTAT
THE WAR ON DISENFRANCHISED VOTERS !!!!!!!!!
you people are whacked
Jan Schmidt
6:55 pm on Friday, June 15, 2012
Seriously Jim... when every citizen has proof, asking for it at the polls is a good thing. I agree with the ID - but not until EVERYONE has it.
So... why don't you stand up for those who don't have an ID?
JIM
6:19 am on Saturday, June 16, 2012
Jan, the nanny state mentality has to stop somewhere , left to the democrats we would never have to be responsible for ourselves,I mean come on, do you think I want to see legal voters turned away at the polls, no, I dont. But if a law is passed and people have 5-6 months to make sure they have an ID to vote,come election day, whose fault is it if they haven't made an effort to procure one ? Is it my fault because I was in favor of voter ID ,NO ,its their fault for not being responsible enough to get one. We will all have to make sure those we know in our circle of family and friends know about the new law and possibly even help them in obtaining an ID by giving them rides or what ever to get an ID. but I cant be responsible for the entire state, if a person doesn't have a drivers licence and needs to find a ride to the polls to vote, if they can ask for a ride to the polls they can ask for a ride to get an ID. Plain and simple it comes down to personal responsibility.
Jan Schmidt
7:58 am on Saturday, June 16, 2012
No, providing Voter ID before being required to show it is hardly wrong, it just doesn't fit the "deny the outliers" we're seeing from the new-Republican leaders.
If you're honest about the need for ID, then it must be provided at no cost to meet the right we are granted to vote in the 14 Amendment.
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Timothy Harden
8:28 am on Saturday, June 16, 2012
Do what the people want. Lynch don't veto.
If vetoed a good reason not to vote for a democrat Governor this November.
73% Think Photo ID Requirement Before Voting Does Not Discriminate
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/april_2012/73_think_photo_id_requirement_before_voting_does_not_discriminate
Latest Rasmussen poll bad news for Democrats
http://digitaljournal.com/article/323157
Democrats and Republicans Support a Voter ID-Check Law
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2011/06/10/poll-democrats-and-republicans-support-a-voter-id-check-law
News Flash
10:06 am on Saturday, June 16, 2012
Obama Stops Deportations of Illegals. He and the democrats have just sold out the American People.
ForThePeople
10:57 am on Saturday, June 16, 2012
Actually, he put in a stopgap measure to protect children who were brought here. For example, if you're a Mexican child who was brought here, and you "study in our schools, play in our neighborhoods, befriend our kids, pledge allegiance to our flag (quote from Obama)", and possibly serve in our military… you can stay.
It's not right that people can die for our country but not be allowed to live here. It's not right that grown immigrant children have to live in fear and poverty because they're worried someone might tell on them. They live American, and I'm more than happy they will be allowed to stay.
It's about doing the right thing.
And don't feel bad. I'm not getting my way, either. Personally, I would love to deport all the conservative bigots to Iran, where they can be shown the same treatment by mullahs that they show to the American people.
JIM
1:39 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012
obama is flailing like a fish out of water, this amnesty deal has been turned down by the majority of American voters time and time again. obama sees his numbers slipping in the polls and any chance of a second term to finish destroying our economy goes with them, so he will do what ever it takes ,the gay marriage sham was to get the gay vote and the amnesty sham is to get the legal and illegal Latino vote ,its all about getting reelected nothing more ,the only job obama is worried about is his , if you think this is BS ,your clearly not thinking........ the fraud obama is toast in Nov
JIM
8:26 am on Monday, June 18, 2012
for the sheeple you can spin it any way you want but it comes down to the dictator obam selling out the American unemployed or employed workers for votes. This amnesty has been REJECTED by the American voter every time its brought up butt king obama makes the laws now ,the serfs and congress have no say in the matter anymore
JIM
8:31 am on Monday, June 18, 2012
for the sheeple ,there is no need to deport all the conservatives, there's a lot less of you communists why dont you all just move to Russia or Cuba ? problem solved !!! and please take comrade lil joe and dave with you