patching...
Update: Looking for breaking news or the hot stories of the day? Click here to subscribe to the free Concord NH Patch newsletters! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Town Wants Obama Campaign to Foot The Bill for Monday's Visit

The Durham Town Council will discuss the issue on Monday morning.

 

DURHAM, NH -- The Obama campaign is locked in a stalemate with a small New Hampshire town over who should foot the cost for police protection for the president's visit on Monday.

Durham Town Administrator Todd Selig says the Obama campaign should pay the $20,000 to $30,000 in police overtime costs it will take to provide adequate protection for the president's visit to Oyster River High School on Monday afternoon.

But the Obama campaign says it won't pay, which has prompted the Durham Town Council to call a special Monday morning meeting to address the issue.

"Certainly we welcome candidates," Durham Town Councilor Diana Caroll said. "It's important for our democracy. But when it comes to presidential candidates, it does cost a lot of money for all the services... Who pays for that? That's the question."

An Obama campaign official confirmed Saturday night that it will not cover the cost of any police details associated with Monday's visit. Typically, the campaign does not pay for security planning, the source said, only for expenses related to the event itself. For example, the campaign is paying to use Oyster River High School on Monday.

Durham is a small town with only about 14,000 residents, near the New Hampshire seacoast. It also serves as home to the University of New Hampshire.

"We are  hopeful that the campaign will ultimately reimburse us," Selig said. "As of (Saturday) afternoon, the campaign indicates their Chicago central office had declined to reimburse those costs.

"The argument is that they're not asking for public safety service, the Secret Service is, and they don't reimburse," he added. "Our response is the campaign is coming to Durham, and the town needs to ensure the safety of the town. If not for the campaign coming, we wouldn't have to incur that cost."

The town has typically covered the cost of presidential visits, but says it shouldn't have to cover expenses for a political campaign.

Many of the town councilors are away this weekend, so Selig said the decision was made to meet at 8:30 Monday morning, less than six hours before Obama is scheduled to speak across town.

According to the agenda, the stated reason for the meeting is for "Discussion and possible action regarding the upcoming Obama for America Campaign stop scheduled to be held in Durham at the Oyster River High School at noon on Monday, June 25, 2012, the financial impact of this campaign stop upon the municipality for the anticipated unbudgeted $20,000 to $30,000 cost associated with local public safety services required by the campaign visit."

Carroll, the Durham town councilor, said the council's intent is not to try to "disinvite" Obama from coming to Durham, as some have implied. Especially since the council never invited the president.

"It's wonderful to have a presidential candidate here," she said. "But we need to think about the future. This fall, we could have another presidential candidate (in town)."

Instead, Selig said, the council will mostly likely bring forward a resolution on Monday that will "address the challenges we're facing" and express concern about the Obama campaign's decision.

"It would be very respectful and appropriate," Selig said. "There's no question the town is going to provide the public safety resources necessary to keep the president and the town safe. It's not about that. It's really an issue of billing."

Selig also stressed that this is not a partisan issue.

"We have had and will have this conversation with any candidate who comes to Durham and requires services," he said. "We would bill them and have in the past."

Two New Hampshire mayors issued statements on Saturday emphasizing that their communities would be happy to pay any costs associated with a presidential visit.

"The City of Rochester would have been delighted to host President Obama during his upcoming visit to Strafford County," Rochester Mayor T.J. Jean said. "While I remain cognizant of the additional security and public safety costs inherent with such an event, I truly believe the opportunity for our citizens to experience a Presidential visit outweigh the cost."

“It is an honor to have President Obama back in the Granite State," added Portsmouth Mayor Eric Spear. "For decades, New Hampshire has played a unique role in Presidential politics. Just as we have with Governor Romney, Portsmouth residents would be proud to welcome President Obama to our city. The attention and exposure of a Presidential visit always provides great value for our community, offering the chance to showcase our vibrant economy and diverse cultural offerings."

Related Topics: Barack Obama, Eric Spear, T.J. Jean, Todd Selig, and durham

susanthe

10:50 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Would someone please ask Mr. Selig what other candidates they have had this discussion with in the past? What other candidates have they billed? Was President Bush billed when he visited UNH in 2002?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dennis Taylor

11:03 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

I agree with you that all candidates need to pay for their campaigning visits. However, based on your logic, it must be fine for Obama to cheat the town if the town allowed itself to be cheated by Bush. We need to start somewhere, so let's start today with Obama. Otherwise, based on your logic, we can never demand a candidate make reimbursement because there will always have been some other candidate who did not reimburse.

Comment_arrow

Deborah Hammer

1:25 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Doesn't Mitt Romney owe the state of NH money that he borrowed a few yrs ago.. ?

Comment_arrow

John Waters

10:54 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Let me set all of you straight on a few things. First I am in the seacoast area of NH and my wife works in Durham.
Mr. Bush's campaign PAID Durham from campaign funds. Source WMUR Broadcast of June 23 2012.
Second to Deborah Hammer Mitt Romney never borrowed money from my state.
Third to Reilly Reid you have no idea how much of an negative impact these canidates have on the budgets of our small towns if they refuse to pick up the tab for police and clean up after these campaign events.
To date the only campaign that has not picked up the tab has been President Obama's.

Comment_arrow

Russell Odone

11:04 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

No president has squandered more of OUR money than Mr Obama... He has redistributed wealth to all but the middle class.... I'm sick of sliding down hill to support the elitist parasites at the federal level

Comment_arrow

darrell champion

11:12 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Bush again...will you crybabies ever grow up? What is it about "Obama is a career campaigner" do you not understand? I don't think the taxpayers should pay for a campaign visit either, it is different from a presidential vist, but you just don't get that do you?

Comment_arrow

Donna

11:27 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

He is right , ALL candidates should be billed. Why should taxpayers pay for the visit??? Theis what their millions in campaign is for isn't it???

Comment_arrow

jimmy lee

11:35 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

maybe the town was not BROKE in 2002, did you check on that before you developed dissentary of the lips?

Comment_arrow

Daniel Attardi

11:36 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

John Waters

10:54 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Let me set all of you straight on a few things. First I am in the seacoast area of NH and my wife works in Durham.
Mr. Bush's campaign PAID Durham from campaign funds. Source WMUR Broadcast of June 23 2012.
Second to Deborah Hammer Mitt Romney never borrowed money from my state.
Third to Reilly Reid you have no idea how much of an negative impact these candidates have on the budgets of our small towns if they refuse to pick up the tab for police and clean up after these campaign events.
To date the only campaign that has not picked up the tab has been President Obama's

Comment_arrow

Daniel Attardi

11:37 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

John Waters
Let me set all of you straight on a few things. First I am in the seacoast area of NH and my wife works in Durham.
Mr. Bush's campaign PAID Durham from campaign funds. Source WMUR Broadcast of June 23 2012.
Second to Deborah Hammer Mitt Romney never borrowed money from my state.
Third to Reilly Reid you have no idea how much of an negative impact these candidates have on the budgets of our small towns if they refuse to pick up the tab for police and clean up after these campaign events.
To date the only campaign that has not picked up the tab has been President Obama's

Comment_arrow

Hugh Jazzoul

11:41 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The economy has never been this bad before and NH is a Democrat stronghold so this is not a poke at Obama or the Democrats ,its just a sign of the times !!

Comment_arrow

George

11:44 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Why ask anyone anything?? Times are bad all over thanks to your fabulous help to the 1% so pay up or keep moving else where!! Plain and simple!

Comment_arrow

Cheryl Dianne

12:02 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Yes, the Bush campaign paid.

Comment_arrow

Gary Gray Sr

12:07 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Bush was not asked to foot bill because HE was welcomed... Obama was not!

Comment_arrow

Dennis Wayne

12:40 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Ahh and the councilors are conveniently out of town,Yep,I would be too.

Comment_arrow

Dennis Wayne

12:42 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Ahh,And the town councilors are conveniently out of town.They should at least ask in person.Maybe the local democrats can chip in and pay for it.

Comment_arrow

Maggie

1:15 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Absolutely he was. Funny you should pick Bush instead of Clinton, huh?

Comment_arrow

John Dalton

1:17 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The President is paid by the taxpayers to be the President, not to campaign. It's bad enough that we have to foot the bill for those extravagant, multi-million dollar vacations, we should not have to pay for his campaigning. He has collected hundreds of millions of dollars for his campaign.......it's time to let the taxpayers off the hook. Every trip that the President makes costs us millions of dollars and if he leaves the country, it's tens of millions of dollars. This President has made 179 campaign trips so far and we have paid for all of them. ENOUGH.....time to spend some of that $30,000 a plate campaign money. And I don't care who the President is or was, I have always felt this way. We are paying you to be the President and that's what you should be doing. If you are a good President, you wouldn't have to campaign for re-election and if you're a bad one, all the campaigning in the world isn't going to get you re-elected.

Comment_arrow

Maggie

1:17 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Absolutely he did. Funny you should pick Bush instead of Clinton. Huh?

Comment_arrow

patricia

1:37 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I would say susanthe ,you have a good point. I would suspect Pres bush didn't and I would suspect the people complaining are either tea Party or Republican.

Comment_arrow

Cheryl Dianne

1:55 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

According to the Union Leader, yes, Bush's campaign was charged, and paid Durham for the police support required by the Secret Service.

Comment_arrow

Roger Dean Smart

2:10 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Hell, this President should compensate the entire United States, because he is simply one who thinks America should pay for everything including his lavish trips overseas and 200 rounds of golf. You can honestly tell me he is for America? I don't think so, and I will die believing that. He is evil, and I think he works for "Satan". He must be his right hand man, because all of the things he is doing to the USA. This Obama is not qualified to run any country, not even Kenya, Africa where he was born. Take your socialist and marxist ideas and use them where you are from, not changing the way the Americans live. We do not want "socialism" in this country, period.! This President is selling out America!

Comment_arrow

Trudy Peters

2:17 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

If this was the practice before it needs to end. It is unfair and it is a huge burden on cities and taxpayers. At a time when it is barely manageble to keep cities afloat, and people are sacrificing greatly just to maintain a decent existence. The burden of paying for a political office runners political and financial aspirations by taxpayers is insane.

Obama wastes enough of taxpayer money on their constant Vacations and enmdless entertainment. We certainly should not pay for him to further his personal promotion and political ambitions..

Comment_arrow

mark riggan

2:36 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

the obama has no problem spending OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY, the champion of the ENTITLED

Comment_arrow

Pat Andersen

2:41 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

costs a lot more to a city or town to met security standards for a President than it does for a candidate...so was he invited or did he announce he would appear? My feeling is If he was invited by thhe town then they pay and if he decided to grace the town with his presence then he pays...that is fiscally responsible and just plain good manners for anyone...candidates or Presidents. Maybe if this policy was followed people wouldn't be so quick to race around for the sole purpose of photo ops.

Comment_arrow

james

2:54 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I love all of these comments saying Obama has no problem spending other peoples money.. Funny, not a peep about when Bush got us into TWO Wars, spending TRILLIONS( and still counting).. And now , all of a sudden it's not correct for President's to campaign... Yeah, we know what this is about, and where it's comming from...

Comment_arrow

Rick Clawson

3:03 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I find it really ironic that some feel it is okay for towns/cities to bear the additional costs of political candidates campaigning for their own benefit, as is the case with obama, who has no problem with spending taxpayer money for personal benefit. With many cities and states having extreme revenue problems and meeting budgets, I think it's more than inappropriate for these municipalities to cover the cost of someone campaigning for self-benefit. I compare it to the large numbers of vacations this president has taken (14 at last count) with large financial burdens upon the taxpayer. Remember, it was obama who said, "Americans, I feel your pain." If he does in fact feel our pain, why does he and his campaign expect cities he visits to pay for added security costs? I know, if you like the guy and despite how horribly he's done overall, you're more than willing to overlook any extra costs he places on the taxpayer so we can all enjoy seeing him, and maybe get a chance to say, "Hey, I shook his hand!" Wow, that is so important! It would almost sway me to vote for someone, all because I shook their hand. Well, not really.

Comment_arrow

my name

3:07 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

For God's sake, stop bringing up Bush every time obama screws up.

Comment_arrow

JT

3:07 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The difference is this president has driven us off a climb when it comes to the economy and it was not an issue before. I know he said the private sector is doing just fine and he has created 2.4 million new jobs ( he fails to mention during that time we have lost 4.1 million thought) so that would be the difference.

Comment_arrow

Judy currie

3:17 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Plus which we all
I've in a different world today. if Obama has raised campaign funds he should reimburse towns his visits in create a hardship.

Comment_arrow

Hangtough

3:39 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The economy was not as bad when Pres. Bush was visiting and the towns could afford to foot the bill themselves. That has not been the case for a long time now. I think they should just tell him not to come. It should not be their problem. If he wants to go, let him pay and the same for Romney.

Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

3:52 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

If it was Princess Diana, Mother Theresa, or any other famous person, they'd be more than willing to pay the 30 k. The GOP have instructed the Republicans, just like ALEC and the Koch brothers to complain about the same thing, even though they know it will put them on the map, give them great publicity, people will spend money in their corner stores, gas stations and restaurants, they will be national publicity and it will help tourism. That is why the mayor supports it because she's not stupid.....wonder what party Caroll and Selig are with?

Comment_arrow

Rodney Mattson

3:59 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

He was billed and yes he paid and yes Republicans don't argue. Thats like LA not getting paind the 3 million for protection whats 30,000 dollars to the democrats they shouldn't of had to be asked.

Comment_arrow

Barbara Brown

4:41 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Bush PAID. Why is it when your chosen one is criticized, you revert back to Bush? Every other candidate PAID, please explain to me what makes Obama so damned special that he is exempt from being billed? Some sort of logic would be nice but I seriously doubt it would happen

Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

4:51 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

@Barbara Brown..."Bush paid" are you serious? Please show the proof where Bush paid for the wars? Just an FYI, he borrowed money from China to pay for these two wars and claimed he balanced the budget when he introduced a prescription plan that wasn't paid for. Get your head out of the sand and show the proof otherwise you could be hired by Fox Faux news for their lies and unfounded comments.

Comment_arrow

Rob

5:02 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Romney should pick-up the tab. After reading these posts it appears Obama got a lot of votes for him.

Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

7:47 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Actually Dennis if you want to start somewhere it just may be a good idea to start
with a candidate that you support and not with a candidate that you oppose just
a couple of months before an election. [in an attempt to drum up a campaign issue]
Did you ever think of that?????????????????

Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

8:21 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Trudy Peters and others on this thread,
You need to get you heads out of the Faux "News" gutter. That is the only
possible explanation for you to have the audacity to even dream of trying to knock Obama for his vacations. Is it theoretically possible for even FOX viewers to not know
that Bush took more vacations and spent far more on them than any other president in history? Doesn’t anyone care about facts?
www.politicususa.com/cost-obama-christmas-vacation-bush.html.

Dennis Taylor

10:50 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Why should the town have to provide any extra anything for a man who is supposed to be at his current job, not up here trying to convince us to give him the next job. Obama should lose all pay for the times that he is campaigning, and of course, should pay for all costs associated with his campaigning. Let's move forward to some sanity in this area of politics!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Keith F Thompson

11:07 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

So, the President of the United States should punch a time clock? Should he get overtime when he works on the weekend? If a crisis hits at three a.m., does Vice President Biden have to fill in if the President has already put in his forty hours for the week?
Why the sudden concern for the cost? Other than the constant distortion by Fox News that you seem to be parroting, I mean.
Unless, of course you can point to your serious concern expressed in an online post or letter to the editor from when President Bush visited the state in his campaign for re-election.
I thought not.

Comment_arrow

Deborah Hammer

1:28 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Move forward to what? A rich Mormon? excuse my language, but a mormon running this country? Have you lived with them? I'm not prejudice, but I've lived with them neighbor to neighbor and they do NOT accept everyone.. c'mon now...

Comment_arrow

gary schlesinger

11:20 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

did you have the same opinion about the mission accomplished banner on the aircraft carrier and the then president arriving in a fighter jet? who paid for that bit of advertising that turned out to be false?

Comment_arrow

Tom English

11:46 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Deborah hammer>>>>>.. you are prejudice period. Why even mention mormon.? Mormon is like vomit in your mouth, it shows in how you write.

Comment_arrow

Jim Taylor

1:16 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Are the tax payers paying for O to fly or ride to his functions? Or is the campaign paying for that?

Comment_arrow

patricia

1:38 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I wouldn't let anyone hear me say what you just typed. You Mr Taylor just showed a certain level of ignorance and bigotry.

Obama 2012

Comment_arrow

Brenda

2:31 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I agree, for a man who claimed to want to fundamentally transform the United States of America, he sure has made a lot of enemies.

Comment_arrow

Dorothy Jane Legg

3:25 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

To Patricia,
We do accept everyone. You need to visit one of our local churches, and you will be welcomed. You need to do some reading from historical books to find out what the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is really all about. I highly recommend The Book of Mormon as a start. Our Bible is the King James Version that all christian use. Try us, I believe you will like us. I was not born and raised Mormon. I was born and raised Catholic. As a Mormon my life now revolves around The Scriptures, 10 Commandments, Book of Mormon, and family. My best to you and all your future endeavors. Dorothy

Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

3:56 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

It's called educating people about bills, for instance Dennis, did you know that the NH GOP passed the following bills in the NH house? 1. make school non-mandatory 2-lower high school drop out age to 16, back to 1971 when we are already over 26th in education in the developed nations in the world .3 elliminate lunch breaks ....the list goes on for radical bills.....education education education...the candidates have to go around educating people for what they stand otherwise people will just vote for someone because of their looks or religion....sad, but true....people are two busy trying to pay down their debt and getting educated,...right where the GOP like the people, poor and in debt so they can get away with deregulation and make their rich friends richer.

Dennis Taylor

10:54 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

I just don't get all the fawning. Obama's skin is his own, and he needs to pay to protect it. It is not an honor for Durham to have to do without or raise taxes once his majesty blows town. Let the fools who want Obama to come to town pay for his royal reception. I hope that Obama really stiffs the people of Durham so there will be one more reason to vote for the idiot Romney or the sensible, founding-fathers like Ron Paul.

Reply
Comment_arrow

ForThePeople

11:10 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

1) This is standard procedure. You have to protect the leader of the free world whether or not you agree with him.
2) Stop hijacking the 'founding fathers' with your own politics. All of this nostalgia over the founding fathers is getting a little ridiculous. Remember,we still had slavery back then. They were not perfect, they were men (all men!), and our Constitution had to be amended 27 times, well-past their natural demise. You can be poetic about it all you want and live off of the feeling you get by saying the words "founding fathers" and trying to manipulate people, but you are so far off the mark if you want to send us back to the colonial age of this country.

Comment_arrow

Keith F Thompson

11:16 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Interesting choice of words. His skin is his own. A different standard for one President than any other. A different standard for one candidate over the other.
I could say more, but your words say so much about you and those like you, I prefer to let them stand on their own.

Comment_arrow

Heidi Dietrich

10:58 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Dennis, I wish I could give you a medal. Everyone fawns over Obama and I don't get it. Consider yourself pinned with a medal, okay?

Comment_arrow

Carl Jameson

11:55 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

He is not Obama, he is the President of the United States. The same United States that allow you to speak freely and give your name so that you can proudly own what you have said without repercussions even if you are totally wrong.

The cost of securing the President has always been paid by the city or county that he is in.This is nothing new or particular to this president. The "idiot Romney" or"founding-father Ron Paul" won't pay either if elected and decided to go to Durham or any other community.
The President did not just arrive in Durham or Tuesday after deciding to go on Monday. This a planned event and Durham knew the particulars: the estimated costs and who was paying for what long before he showed up in their city.
If they did not or could not afford the visit or they were unable to provide security like any other city, they could have back out. Now they want their cake and to eat it too by saying that the President should pay for the visit after the fact. Maybe Durham should consider sending back any ferderal funds received at their next meeting.

Comment_arrow

Georgia

1:17 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Yes, just like it is standard procedure for the Vice President of the US to lose his Secret Service protection 6 mos after leaving office. However because of the threats on Dick Cheney's life, he is still receiving Secret Service protection. Who do you think is paying for that? You and I are and the rest of the american people.

Comment_arrow

Mary Price

1:30 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I too, believe that the people that want Obama there should pay his expenses or have Obama himself pay out of his campaign money.

Comment_arrow

Jeff Thomas

2:38 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

good comments Mr. Taylor.

Comment_arrow

Gerald Black

2:44 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Obama needs to pay the bill plain and simple. "ForThePeople" Obama is not going as the leader of the free world, he is going as someone running for that position. "Carl Jameson" he is Obama and please read what I said to ForThePeople, NO city should have to pay the extra cost just because a person running for office wants to speak there. Note to the folks of Durham, just notify the Secret Service and the campaign folks that NO extra security will be provided, see how fast they cut you a check then.

Comment_arrow

Dorothy Jane Legg

3:34 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Dennis,
If you were president, you would want all the security the government would provide to you. I agree with "ForThe People".

Comment_arrow

Joann Mieles

3:52 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Ron Paul? Are you crazy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment_arrow

Brian St. Onge

10:36 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

If Ron, the nut, Paul had been a founding father, this country would no longer be the United States of America. We'd be under Japanese, German or British rule.

Mark Vincent

11:34 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

I wonder why the Obama campaign would push back on paying $30K of expenses. I thought this was the campaign that had a billion dollars to spend? Maybe that fundraising isn't going so well.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Georgia

1:18 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

No sir. That was the Republican Party who has 'billions" to spend and if they run out Willard will take the money out of his off shore account.

Comment_arrow

Silverstreak

1:45 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Obama's campaign money is much smaller this election than the previous one. His big donors have not ponied up yet as in the past. Romney not only has the big donors of the Republican party but Romney's own wealth as well. So 20K would put a big dent inhis coffers. Clinton and Bush went everywhere to campaign and the towns they went to paid the bill. I'm not particularly in favor of that but it has been common procedure. So Obama shouldn't have to pay either. Whoever said that Bush paid must be lying as there has not been any candidate who has done so.

Comment_arrow

Rick Clawson

3:23 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Ironic, part II. The campaign contributions heir obama has received thru those so naive to believe him, is supposed to be used for the very purpose of paying for any and all campaigning costs. There isn't supposed to be any burden upon the people or places he visits. That's why there is limited advertising/campaiging early on in the election cycle. However, if a candidate (or a "president") can get away from spending any of his/her campaign money on any particular event then it allows that candidate (or president) to use that same money for other purposes later on. Being on the cheap is a good way to describe it. In this case, it's "I'm the king and I can do whatever I want. Who's going to stop me?" And that is why our govt is currently not operating as a republic, but instead as a Aristocracy, where one person is making their own rules as they go along. The minions who support him fail to recognize importance of what's really going on. And I feel sorry for them. Someone said, "Free speechna dfredon to say what you want." Well, it was several years ago that this same administration attempted to prevent FOX News from attending a press conference because this administration did/does not agree with everything FOX says or does. Now, I do not listen to FOX News, I have no attachment to it what-so-ever, but that, you minions IS in fact censorship, attempted by this same "transparent administration." What happens when you say or do something they don't like?

Riley Reid

11:46 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

This is really STUPID. Seriously? What is the Town of Durham going to do when the Presidential Motorcade rolls in, stop it and ask for the toll to be paid?

Durham's local businesses will make a fortune selling bottled water for $2 a bottle.

Reply
Comment_arrow

darrell champion

11:17 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

It's a campaign ding-dong, not a simple visit...that's why they don't want to pay. I wouldn't either, Obama spending other people's money as usual.

Comment_arrow

Rick Clawson

3:31 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Well, Riley, I guess they could just allow things as they may, and not make any security changes for this "ruler of the not so free world." I have a good question for ya. "What happens if heir obama loses this election and still has all this money left over in his campaign chest?" Will he walk away with a cool $500M? I would not underestimate his intentions. Spend as little as possible, make the taxpayers pay for most of it, and if I lose, I'll be fat, happy, and rich (at the taxpayer expense), and no one will know the better. Do you really believe that he pays for any of these trips or vacations he's made since being annointed to the throne? How about that quick dash to NYC to enjoy the opera? "Americans, I feel your pain!" I say, "Oh really?" Laughing all the way to the bank. "Hey, Michelle, we fooled them again!"

Comment_arrow

Lloyd Winfield

12:22 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

How can you say someone is telling a lie when you don't know that person. just saying

Jan Schmidt

6:57 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Shame on Selig, its obvious that this is an attack on the President, as since forever towns in NH have welcomed their position as important in the politics.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ruth Kevghas

8:16 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Thank you Jan for bringing a bit of civility to this- This is the President of our Country; whether you agree with any of his policies, he is our President! What has happened to having a level of respect for the person elected to the office of President?

I have never heard of a city or town reacting in the way that Durham is by asking the sitting President to pay for protection when visiting them. There are many towns and cities that do not get that privilege. I think some civics courses ought to be given more, and a course in civil discourse. I did not support some of the previous administrations, but I did not dishonor the office they held.

Comment_arrow

Cheryl Dianne

12:07 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Other presidential candidates have paid their way. Call on the Obama campaign to do the same. It's not that hard to do.

Comment_arrow

Cheryl Dianne

12:09 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Ruth, the reason it's in the press is because Obama is the first campaign to refuse to pay the bill. It's a campaign stop. It's to be paid for by the campaign. Past presidents have done it, and so should Obama. We're not quite a welfare state YET.

Comment_arrow

Tom

1:20 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Where is your proof Cheryl that the others have paided ??

Comment_arrow

Wayne Bertrand II

1:32 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Tom:
Where is your proof they haven't? The article states that Selig claims "we have [billed campaigners] in the past" and no claim was given to the contrary. She was just using the info made available by the reporter.

Comment_arrow

Dennis Taylor

1:50 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

We can welcome the fraud, but not be burdened financially by his campaign visit. He is coming to Durham because he believes he will get something out of it. Durham and every other town in the nation, needs fee schedules that candidates must pay in order to perform in their town. These fee schedules should be high enough to reimburse the town. Are the candidates doing something so worthwhile that they cannot be made to pay? Shouldn't not burdening the nation be the highest priority for campaign spending, above salaries and ad buys?

Comment_arrow

mike

2:30 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Aw hurt feelings? simple solution, there is no written in law regulation that says anyone has to provide security for a cantidate, Bamas security is the secret services responsibility let him provide his own security, or stay away

Comment_arrow

Rick Clawson

3:59 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Respect is given when respect is due. This "president" has brought so much divisiveness, more hatred, and partisanship to this country, and all by design to fragment the population so as to divert people from the real issues which should be important; jobs, economy, and irresponsible govt spending (particularly his spending). Because you favor a particular person does not make his actions or behavior acceptable. I am anxious for him to complete his mission of destruction of this country he has benefitted from so much, but at the same time hates (see Meet the Press interview September 2008). "Michelle and I have put our hatred of this country aside to run for president." At that point, perhaps the minions will begin to understand just how horribly wrong they are/were. Until then, continue drinking your kool aid.

Mark A. Buckawicki

7:33 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I will always reimburse a city, town, campground, or family member's home for any security costs incurred as a result of my visit -- it's the right thing to do.

Reply

Joe

7:58 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The celebrity fund raising gala hosted by Sarah Jessica Parker brought $40K/person into Obama's coffer. So, even if the "Barack Obama Dog and Pony Show", has to fork over $30K, he still leaves town with $10K in change from just ONE of the donations he received at Sarah's party.

Yes, this makes me feel pity for this "poor" man. How will he survive?

How come when a liberal has money to spend and hordes it, it is "no problem". But when a conservative has money and doesn't spend it, he/she is considered "selfish", unwilling to "share"? Hummm, inquiring minds want to know.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom

11:02 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Great post Joe. I laugh when I read comments about what Bush did or said.....talk about sheep being led to slaughter.

Comment_arrow

Jan Schmidt

11:34 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

This is now about what you can afford?

And you have a problem with a plain old-fashioned fundraiser when money from everywhere in the world is being poured into this race?

Comment_arrow

Tom

1:21 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The president should never pay !!! NEVER

Comment_arrow

Peggy Valois

2:07 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Not being a local citizen I want only to note that all of us have been adversely affected by the current economic state and that goes for local municipalities as well as individuals and as great as our United States Government. I say the campaign should pay as it is a campaign expense and all candidates should do the same. If our elected officials are going to insist on these expensive campaigns then they need to fully foot the bill; otherwise, please adhere to less expensive campaigns.

Comment_arrow

Wendy

3:56 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Because Joe, everyone knows that consevatives don't "Pay their Fair Share"! This inquiring mind is paying 45% of our income to Obama's socialist government. Then you read about something like this and all I can say is Durham, tell Obama's campaign to to Stay Out! We still live in a Democracy. Stop him from coming and let all the media outlets know about it and why. Show him for the cheap Mother that he is. Trust me when I say you'll get Nationwide support!!!

Comment_arrow

Rick Clawson

4:09 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Joe, the same do-gooders don't want to talk about the obamas flying their dog to Hawaii (separate plane) to join them for vacation. If I'm not mistaken, the dog was flown back to CONUS by himself (again) for a photo-op. Where is the concern about undue costs on the taxpayer? See, people see the truth when they feel it is convenient. In this case, those who cannot see beyond today are not capable of understand the ramifications of irresponsible behavior. i.e. life long welfare recipients. obama is not a broke campaigning candidate. Much of his funding is unknown, as is much of his lack of transparency he so strongly espoused would be his mantra for his administration. Sealed from everyone is virtually everything in his life, including his involvement with Fast & Furious... Honesty only exists when it is convenient, and right now, everything he does is of no convenience for him to reveal.

Karen Davidson

8:09 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

We are talking about the President of the United States. It is an honor and a priviledge for the President to come to any city or town in the US. It sounds like a stunt that the Town Leaders in Durham are doing, and if I was one of them, I would protest that this upcoming meeting is totally uncalled for and should be canceled. Did Stratham charge Mr. Romney for both of the times he was there to announce his running for President. And does everyone forget, that once a President and in office, he is running everyday for reelection the first year. The second year, he is usually helping out the next person who is running for president. The job of the President doesn't stop when he is running for reelection. A president's job is 24 hours a day, 7 hours a week. Would the folks complaining like a job that has long hours, and now a days very little respect.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom

11:03 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

we are talking about the "sorriest excuse" for a president we've ever had. Just to clarify.

Comment_arrow

John Henry

11:08 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

It is not really a privilege. He needs to pay up------------he's a spendaholic on taxpaer's money, so he should spend it and show how wasteful he is. Its probably a mostly white town, so he is sticking it to them.

Comment_arrow

jonas Miller

11:09 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

With nearly unlimited vacations (at tax payer expense) $400,000.00 a year, and all the free perks.and etc, etc, etc. poor Oblamer gets no respect.

Comment_arrow

Cheryl Dianne

12:12 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Karen, yes, Romney paid... Bush paid. This is news because Obama won't pay. It's a campaign stop. It's a campaign expense. Using the excuse that it's a secret service request, not a "campaign request" is low.

Comment_arrow

Barbara Harrison

1:05 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Thank you Karen for a straight- on post. And as one other poster noted, this event has been planned for some time. So why is the cost of security just now an issue? "Something stinks in the state of Denmark"....and it reeks in the state of NH.

Comment_arrow

Eli Jones

1:30 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Tom, you are correct they don't come any sorrier than b+ barry. Now watch as all the Obamaphiles pull out their worn out race card in their feeble attempt to counter your truthfulness.

Comment_arrow

Jim Taylor

1:40 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I didnt want Obama here in Phoenix, but because he was here there were no state troopers on the road, they are named DPS. And the only DPS ing they did was to protect Obama. DPS = Dept of Public Safety. The public was not safe.

Comment_arrow

Jim Taylor

1:45 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I for one havent taking a vacation in many years, and when I do, it costs 300 bux, For 4 million dollars I could have retired and most of my family. I am sure I have out worked the prez. No one has handed me jack.

Comment_arrow

Gregg Mcphedrain

3:01 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

in the worse recession EVER - in a global economic meltdown Karen = WHEN ALL HE HAS DONE IS RAISE CAMPAIGN MONEY TO RUN - WHAT DO YOU THING THAT PEOPLE DONATE MONEY FOR - TV ADS ONLY - sorry times change - and your entitlement attitude - is sik

Comment_arrow

Ruth Kevghas

3:37 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

JIm-- The President makes $400,000.00 (four-hundred-thousand dollars per year); which if you think of it- he is a grossly UNDERPAID CEO- if you think he is taking 'vacations' too much, think again. The President is NEVER truly on vacation and it requires a lot of energy to manage all the responsibilities and on top of that he has to deal with a lot of unpleasant personal insults and such on top of it. Maybe you should run for office as you think he has done such a poor job. I for one commend the man for having such forbearance to endure the endless bickering in Congress and I like what he has done so far- do I wish he had done more, of course, but it is that way with every President I have voted for (or not)!

Comment_arrow

ghansen

3:39 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Oh, give me a break! An honor and a privilege? Campaign stops should be paid with campaign funds, not picked up by the taxpayers. Once again, you sheep are being led down the garden path by a person who has done nothing for this country, but only enriched himself and his cohorts. I get so sick of you liberals thinking that this man walks on water. I think you love him so much because of all the freebies he has promised you. Mark my words. If he is elected again, God forbid!, you will see nothing except more empty promises, and you will be paying for all his so-called free programs. Get a grip on reality. When he promised you hope and change, he meant he wanted to change this country to something it has never been. He is more interested in becoming your dictator than your president. He doesn't care about you or anybody else, but only what he can get for himself.

Comment_arrow

John Raussie

3:47 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

he probably does only work 7 hours aweek, good looking out.
why is it a priviledge and an honor? he is just a man like every other man that we the people chose to put in to power and he ended up being bad at his job.
if he hadnt doubled our deficate, he might could afford to pay for security.
do we really need him in office for another for years begging for change.

Comment_arrow

Rick Clawson

4:17 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Karen, if I were to have the perks he will have, and the pay he will have, for the rest of his life, I most certainly would jump on the responsibility. "Now, hmm, should I fly Bo with us? Or should I fly him by himself at taxpayer expense?" I have worked harder jobs than this guy, who has taken 14 vacations in the 3 1/2 years he's been "our fearless leader", and at the same time, I have never been able to take even one. I was a Marine, and being a Marine is a 24 hour a day job. There is no 8 hours and I'm done. I never complained, but I never had the chance to fly "Michelle" up to NYC for a night of opera, either. That is a really difficult job. All this guy has done is find ways to be as divisive as possible so we can all be divided on the issues so he can maybe slip thru for one more term, and if he tries it, usurps the Constitution and annoints himself president for life. Hey, who's going to stop him? Nostradamus predicted, "There will be an election in a Republic and the loser will refuse to leave office."

Karen Davidson

8:27 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

And how much is this special meeting going to cost the town for having this meeting? And taking people away from their appointed jobs to attend the meeting. Who will pay for that cost?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Taylor

1:46 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

They did it on over time.

Comment_arrow

Rick Clawson

4:26 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Taking people away from their jobs...only if they choose, and by their choice. It will not be a govt expense, but an expense of the person himself. Nice try, but I wouldn't take my time to see any political candidate, because to see them would not change my opinion one way or the other. It must be a woman thing. "Oh, I just love the way he talks!" I actually heard a teacher say that one day. I just about barfed. Kinda like a democrat winning Gabriella Gifford's seat (Rep AZ) in a Republican strong hold. I say "HUH?" "Oh, I felt so sorry for her!" Yeah, and life goes on. People need to get real, and look at things for what they are. Politicians will say anything at the moment if it benefits them. Look at their voting record to decide what they're really about.

Sonia Prince

8:27 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Yes, I'm sure the city and the people would find a way because it gives National/internation attention to our cities and towns, not to mention it's an honor and not every day that any state gets the President of the United States coming to their city or town. Just like if it was Princess Diana or Mother Theresa or anyone else who helps people; he is admired, people will come. Mayor Lozeau was more than pleased last time Obama came to Nashua and mentioned her, not once, but three times in his speech, praising Lozeau her for the green trash trucks she purchased for Nashua and looking out for clean air. The crowd applauded wildly and it puts us on the map and sends a message to businesses that Nashua is open for business! It's an honor.....just like any other more famous person that people crowd to see in any venue. There is a saying, "Any publicity is good publicity" and this is definitely good publicity, we'd be crazy to turn it down!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom

11:04 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Well, he's been in MY STATE of MICHIGAN waaaaaaaaaaaaay too many times. Let him come to yours. We don't need him here!

Comment_arrow

Rick Clawson

4:32 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Wow! Did it really make a difference? It would've made a bigger difference if he didn't go there. People could've been working generating tax revenue to fund the city's operating budget, spending their hard earned money in businesses to enable those same businesses to remain open and provide services and goods to their customers, and saved taxpayer money by not creating an unnecessary city expense, diverting city revenue away from other things vital to the city's operation. Who cares about "national attention?" Your community, along with hundreds of other communities get visited by these people living on the public dole...oh, sounds like welfare recipients, doesn't it?

Sonia Prince

8:32 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

With Durham's attitude, maybe no one should have any events in Durham in the future....no one, after this event, should buy gas or go to any restaurants afterwards (that is my routine), maybe we should skip this town and go to the next town and spend our money. I've never been to Durham, but this certainly could be the last time. Again, it puts Durham on the map. Their marketing director should be fired and the President should never ever come back to this town. Disrespectful! I bet if Princess Diane or Mother Theresa or the pope wanted to visit Durham, they fork the $30 000. Shameful!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Taylor

1:48 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

why go there its only 14,000 peeps????

Comment_arrow

Sue Mercier Vail

8:30 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Amen, Sonia. It's embarrassing. That it would cost 30K to protect the 14,000 citizens of Durham cannot be factual, IMO! So much hate over Obama, and over anything he does... Sickening. Thanks to all of you who treat the Official leader of the country with respect and recognize that it is an honor to have a visit no matter what the reason from the President of the US. My only criticism is aside from the leap to hate routines, is that people are quoting the UL and WMUR as their sources for "Bush paid, Romney paid". Is that really fact checking?

Timothy Harden

8:38 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

@Sonia Prince
The democrats should pony up. Get the money from George Soros or Government Labor Unions.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jane Aitken

10:16 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I think that since many top delegates to the Dem convention have refused to vote for him, we see people are rejecting Obama. This incident with a mere $30K is another clue he's not the messiah they made him out to be.

Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

11:14 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Timothy, you should really find a better argument. Is that the best you can do? Didn't hear you complain when the GOP presidents were doing their rounds? Like the Tea Party, all of a sudden you care?

Comment_arrow

Jerryu2

12:07 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Tim, I did a little research and it is easy to do seeing how literate thes liberals are.... When Dginitaries visit like Princess Dianah, Mother Theresa they pay for secuity Through there own budgets.... If you have a concert who pays for it ... the Promoter/Group.. This is not a Presidential Visit it is a Campaign stop... And Romney has paid for security that is part of the Campaign Budget....

Comment_arrow

Atlant Schmidt

3:27 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Jane, what on Earth are you talking about? There's been no news about *ANY* delegates to the DNC not being willing to support President Obama.

Perhaps you're thinking of the RNC where Ron Paul's delegates are likely to cause trouble for Romney?

News Flash

8:45 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Durham should teach the Democrats a lesson. Do not vote for Obama if he does not pay the $30,000. Pretty simple to me. Democrats crub off the people all the time, it has got to end.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom

1:24 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

A town of 18 k...who needs them ....the President never has to pay !!

Manny Marcel

8:52 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Let's get back on subject!

Republican, Democrat, Independent - they should all pay their own way. There should not be, and I don't see any with Durham, be any partisanship to paying for candidates protection details.

Small towns on tight budgets, and I'm sure cities as well, just don't have the extra cash laying around for this. By the time November comes, a town could get hit with four, five or six candidates at $20K - $30K each. That's a lot to ask of the local taxpayers.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom

11:07 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

and if the truth were known, maybe this town has already had to cut back on it's police force, due to the economy.........and I agree, no matter WHO comes to town, any town.......they should bring their checkbooks to pay for the expense they cause to the taxpayers of that town!

Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

11:17 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Manny and Tom, It's been done like this for years. Didn't hear you complain when the GOP presidents were doing their rounds? Like the Tea Party, all of a sudden you care? I've seen some small towns host some big events before: reason they do it? Attention and people spend money in their town. If I weren't going to Durham Monday, I'd probably never find a reason to go there. Now that I am, it will also boost tourism and people may think it's charming enough to come back.

News Flash

9:02 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Fire some paid Obama Operatives in NH to get the money. They are just pests anyway and nobody likes them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

11:18 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Wow, what a well thought out comment. Seriously? That's the best idea you can think of to complain? This is a blog for adults, NewsFlash, who's too afraid to own his words and mean it by saying his name, go find another playground.

Comment_arrow

Tom

1:25 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

My IQ just lowered by reading your stupid post NEWS !!

rick barasso

9:05 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I say, when Bush pays for "HIS" war in Iraq that made no sense. Then Obama can pay for the police (mamy of whom have jobs because of him) in Durham.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dane Frederick Hoover

9:25 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

@Rick B Remember Presidents don't declare wars that is the job congress so they should pay have to pay us back, check your constitution. Or at least split the bill between Bush, the 89% of the house and senate that supported the Iraq war. Remember Kerry, Clinton, Edwards, Biden, and many more democrats in office voted for it? It wasn't until election time that "they were for it before against it". Funny you don't mention footing the bill for Afghanistan, the "legitimate" war, according to Obama and the Democrats. Afghanistan just reached 2000 deaths and only 575 happened under Bush, but NOT a peep out of the people in the news that tended to give a daily running tally on deaths and costs under Bush. The cost has necessarily skyrocked under Obama for waging this war to win it. It has NOT worked!

But what that has to do with a president that has spent tens of millions of tax payers money campaigning not paying the costs he incurs is beyond me.

Comment_arrow

jonas Miller

11:15 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

You guys really amaze me. anytime Oblamer is discussed about anything, you always bring up Bush,this, Bush,that, Bush, Bush, Bush did this Bush did that. You make me dizzy.

Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

11:20 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Dane, all presidents, yes including GOP presidents, have done this. Just like the Tea Party, all of sudden you care! Let's be real!

Comment_arrow

daniel k

12:20 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

rick barasso; the Hussien's tortured, exterminated, and mass-buried hundreds of Kurds, along with any that oppossed him. There were no rick barasso's in the 40's complaining about Roosevelt and Truman putting an end to Hitler's genocide of the Jews. No rick barosso's complained about Clinton stopping the genocide of Albanians by the Serbs. Or against Clinton's colossal screw-up in Mogadishu. I get it, to the Dems, media, and SNL Bush could do no right; but WAKE UP man. And I seriously doubt he is personally responsible for giving cops more jobs in Durham. Where I live, the private and public sector is cutting down, not expanding. rick I want to have my birthday party at your house, I'll pay for the food, but I expect you to supply the beer, presents, decorations, dj, and security. Thanks bud!

Comment_arrow

ForThePeople

12:30 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Daniel, the Bush war in Iraq was started over weapons of mass destruction that never existed. That lie and rush to judgment cost a lot of people their lives, their families, their careers, and fortunes.

The people that benefited were the Bush administration buddies who make money off the war machine. For all of the whining about socialism, nobody ever uses the word when the rich redistribute the wealth of the country to other rich people.

All I'm asking is for little consistency, a little honesty.

Comment_arrow

Sandi Love

1:27 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Obama ...The President does not have to worry about where his next meal is coming from......The Average Hard Working Tax payer is scrambling to make ends meet for his family...while congress is living Good.

Comment_arrow

JT

3:12 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Rick, would that be the war in iraq that the dems who controlled the house voted to support and continued to fund? Or the Gitmo they were going to close 3 years ago because it was so bad-- oh wait, maybe Bush was right after all. Or the Afgan war the dems all voted for and have now escalated ( the 2000 soldier was just killed there, funny how NBC, ABC, CNN or MSNBC never spent ONE second on that , but when it happened in Iraq, it was their lead story).

And sense this bozo has spent us into oblivion with nothing to show for it, let him pay for it, we will have to pay for his mess for the rest of our lives at this rate.

Comment_arrow

Rick Clawson

4:36 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Since when did obama pay for and appoint all these people to have their jobs in Durham? That's a far reach, kinda like the shovel ready jobs. I'd love to hear how that's worked out. Maybe you have one of these jobs?

Comment_arrow

daniel k

5:34 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

ForThePeople; You're still panning over the WMD scenario? The intelligence community tells Rumsfeld and Powell that there may be WMDs there, they tell Bush, Bush tells us. Obviously thats Bush's fault right? Regardless, America needed to get in there to stop the genocide. There were 4000 US deaths in Iraq which is very unfortunate. There were 400,000 US deaths in WWII which is very unfortunate. If you asked any Kurd or Jew whether it was a rush to judgement, they would disagree with you. When we stop caring about the oppressed is when we loose our status as the greatest nation. Killing Bin Laden was our ticket out of Afghanistan with some self esteem, yet we blew that opportunity when we stayed. IMO, every death there now trying to change the mentality of the crudest people in the crudest part of the world while telling our boys to stop combat operations is a true waste of lives. Ask any soldier thats been there for the past decade the difference between then and now and you'll get your honesty. Not to mention when we do finally pull out, we're going to keep funding the Afghan govt thru 2024. Not much Hope & Change there. I digress, and you're right, Bush is to blame for everything and small towns should pay for Obama's campaign trail.

Kevin Kervick

9:20 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Seems like a no-brainer. Use some of the Goldman Sachs and foreign money to pay the Durham police.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JT

3:13 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

That went straight into the obama re-election fund, since they donated more to him than the republicans, and he has probably already spent it, rumor is he does not know how to balance a budget, but since he never had a real job a day in his life and never owned a business what can we expect.

News Flash

9:27 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

There is a reason the democrats are the "Mooch Party"

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

11:21 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Are you still making childlike remarks? Show your name or go find another playground.

AnneMcCann

9:34 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

In my entire life I've never heard such a ridiculous controversy! Perhaps Durham should check with other cities and towns to see who paid. When VP Gore came to UNH several years ago - who paid?
@NewsFlash
You are just ricidulous..
@Sonia -
I totally agree with you.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom

11:09 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

This has nothing to do with "what other cities and towns".......this is about THIS town. If YOU want to foot the bill for YOUR TOWN HOSTING THE president......then more power to you.

Comment_arrow

jonas Miller

11:18 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Democrats always think they are entitled to OTHER PEOPLE'S money, they want to take your money and give it to the less fortunate, but want to sit on their own.

Comment_arrow

ForThePeople

12:43 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Jonas, are you perpetuating that lie?

The Bush tax cuts with money we didn't have, who benefited the most from that? The wealthy.

Refusing to implement Wall Street regulations, such as the Dodd Frank bill, who benefited the most from that? The wealthy.

All of the unfunded wars, who benefited the most from that? The war machine upper class.

The thousands of pages of loopholes in the tax code, who benefits the most from that? The wealthy.

Who controls over 40% of the financial wealth of America? The top 1%.

You are outright lying if you think Democrats are playing with other people's money and Republicans are somehow a shining beacon of economic morals.

Comment_arrow

Sue Mercier Vail

8:37 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Anne, Is this not ridiculous? All this ridicule! I wish I could see the passion in some of these statements but too many come up simply pro-hate.

News Flash

9:36 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

@AnneMcCann
Democrats sure are expert at using taxpayer money.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark A. Buckawicki

10:50 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Republican or Democrat, I am not sure any member of Congress could be described as an expert in using taxpayer money.

Comment_arrow

Lloyd Winfield

12:47 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

a lot of buisinesses are going to make a lot of money while he is there

Comment_arrow

Becca L.

1:12 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Lloyd, in a town of 14,000 people, how many businesses do you think exist?

Comment_arrow

vayon swicegood

8:20 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

And GOP's are good at sending money to off shore banks.

Comment_arrow

Sue Mercier Vail

8:40 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I appreciate comments from people who use their name and who live here. Conversely.....

Terry Munroe

10:52 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I believe I heard on the local news that a campaign stop is an expense the candidate is to pay. If it were simply a visit from a current politician then the town pays.

Reply

myangel82

10:52 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I agree with them the campaign should have to pay for this..Police, EMT's and firefighters just do not have that kind of money anymore since Gov. took away a lot from them..he has his secret service that should be plenty.

Reply

News Flash

10:57 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

If "Team Obama" can spend a million bucks a year on people who are not even fron NH, then he can pay the Town, or any Town

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

11:27 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

NewsFlash, have you ever met the Koch Brothers or found out about ALEC? I wouldn't bash the Dems if I were you, look in the mirror and examine your party.

Plainer

11:15 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

NH is not the standard run of the mill state. It has its roots deeply embedded in libertarian values in small government, low taxes and laissez-faire attitudes. For example, the House assembly men and women are paid about $214 for the two years they serve. So to put this all into perspective, for a small town to dish out $20K -30K is a big deal for a two hour whistle-stop campaign by the President. It's obvious that the Obama campaign officials have no clue about the mind-set of the people in New Hampshire when they bring big-government values into Durham.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cheryl Dianne

1:02 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

That's right... NH has NO sales tax and NO income tax.

Dorian Mode

11:18 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Well if that's the case I think Obama should skip this one horse town,

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cheryl Dianne

1:02 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

He wouldn't dream of it... UNH? He wants to youth vote.

james

11:19 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

If they refuse to pay for any of the so-called "protection" that is needed, then just don't provide any at all. If they want any additional protection services, then they can bring them along or hire a local service to do it for them. Just because it is the president, doesn't mean that you have to roll over backwards to cater to them. If you did not invite them in the first place then they are on the hook for costs, period. If the campaign doesn't like that then they can go somewhere else.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Wayne Bertrand II

11:55 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The problem is that the extra security isn't for the President himself: it's for crowd control and protection of the attendees. The secret service is already there to protect the President and they will NOT let any local law enforcement (who they will see as ordinary citizens with GUNS who not been vetted properly) anywhere near him. However, political rallies tend to get heated and may get out of control, so the extra police is needed to protect people and property from their own citizens as well the people who will come to town solely for the purpose of hearing the candidate / President speak. Unfortunately, not providing security is not an option.

Sylvan Tieger

11:24 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The Bama's "date" to NYC cost tax payers over 8 million dollars

Mr. Bama's visit to the WTC site and then to go to fund raisers cost tax payers over 12 million

Mrs Bama vacation to Spain cost America tax payers over 135 MILLION all during which Americas are losing their jobs at a record pace and homes in foreclosure, gas prices sky rocketing and flying Air force one cost over $15,000 an hr as Pelosi used air force jets as her private taxi service.

On the bright side Mrs Bama now is proud to be an American for the 2nd time in her life

Let them eat cake she was heard to say when told how many millions of people are out of work

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sylvan Tieger

11:25 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Dear American Taxpayer

For only the second time in my adult life, I am not
ashamed of my country. I want to thank the hard
working American people for paying $242 thousand
dollars for my vacation in Spain .

My daughter Sasha, several long-time family friends,
my personal staff and various guests had a wonderful time.

Honestly, you just haven't lived until you have stayed
in a $2,500.00 per night private 3-story villa at a 5-Star luxury hotel.

Thank you also for the use of Air Force Two
and the 70 Secret Service personnel who tagged
along to be sure we were safe and cared for at all times.
By the way, if you happen to be visiting the Costa del Sol ,
I highly recommend the Buenaventura Plaza restaurant
in Marbella ; great lobster with rice and oysters!
I'm ashamed to admit the lobsters we ate in Martha's Vineyard were not quite as tasty,
but what can you do if you're not in Europe , you have to just grin and bear it?

Air Force Two (which costs $11,351 per hour to operate
according to Government Accounting Office reports)
only used 47,500 gallons of jet fuel for this trip
and carbon emissions were a mere 1,031 tons of CO2.

Michael Dunckley

11:26 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The facts are simple. The agency responsible for providing security for the President of the Federal Republic of the United States of America is the Secret Service. A president should never be finacially liable for security. Further more, to charge any canidate for campaignlng would be against federal election law. All canidates have the right to be heard and charging them tens of thousands of dollars to speak to voters would have an incredibly chilling effect on our entire electorial process. Durham has no legal responibility to provide any additional police personnel for the visit, but they should never charge for whatever service they provide.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cheryl Dianne

1:01 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

They have been asked to provide police service, which will cost $30,000. This is a Secret Service requirement, and the campaign is refusing to pay for it.

Sylvan Tieger

11:26 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

These are only rough estimates, but they are close.
That's quite a carbon footprint as my good friend
Al Gore would say, so we must ask the American
citizens to drive smaller, more fuel efficient cars and
drive less too, so we can lessen our combined
carbon footprint.

I know times are hard and millions of you are struggling
to put food on the table and trying to make ends meet.
So I do appreciate your sacrifices and do hope you
find work soon.

I was really exhausted after Barack took our family
on a luxury vacation in Maine a few weeks ago.
I just had to get away for a few days.

Cordially,
Michelle Obama

P.S. Thank you as well for the $2 BILLION dollar trip
to India from which we just returned!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

3:59 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Sylvan, there are very few places Obama can take his family and be safe. Yes world leaders travel the world, often to bring attention to empoverished areas. If they could go to India by themselves, they would, but this dangerous world doesn't allow leaders or their families to travel without an entourage....reality isn't your forte is it? Why don't you talk to secret service and ask them how hard it is to keep the first family safe, I bet you'll be surprised, you don't have a clue.

Sylvan Tieger

11:27 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

P.SS. Thank you, too, for that vacation trip to
Martha's Vineyard; it was fabulous.

And thanks for that second smaller jet that took our
dog Bo to Martha's Vineyard so we and the children
could have him with us while we were away from the
White House for eleven days. After all, we couldn't
take him on Air Force One because he might pee
on some wires or something.

P.SSS. Oh, I almost forgot to say thanks also for
our two-week trip to Hawaii at Christmas. That 7,000
square foot house was great!
P.SSSs don't forget my ski trip to Vail this winter
and now the girls and I are in Africa with my mom.
All this while Barack golf’s and campaigns to
keep my trips coming for the next 4 years !
Love Ya!Remember, we all have to share the pain of these
economic times equally!
Love to -redistribute- share- the wealth.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lloyd Winfield

12:50 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

sounds like you're jealous to me. You just wish it were you.

mickmcq

11:30 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

You have no clue how much $20,000 can throw off the budget of a small town, especially if this town in NH follows a FY that ends on June 30. The year's money has been allocated and/or spent with little chance of tapping into a funding source to augment a line item.

Reply

Michael Duff

11:34 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Create a fee schedule and permit process for such events. Protect your town.

Reply

Steven Haver

11:36 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I hope that, unless the DNC sees fit to pay, the town files legal action.

Ideally, the Congress would pass relevant legislation; probably to effect that anyone with Secret Service protection must reimburse, but that others will not be required to do so.

Reply

Political Gadfly

11:36 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

They have all done it, but I have always found it offensive that WE have to pay for what a blatantly political trips. Of course, kind of like the business lunch, if they mention something of national importance - then it is NOT a campaign trip and YOU and I pick up the tab. Of course, the "other guy" always has to pay his way, I have
always considered it unfair that local communities have to spend tons of money for a visit that should be totally funded by the party sponsoring the trip. But, like one of
the respondents I really am tired of everyone justifying things because someone else did - as if it makes it ok for Obama. Wake up - remember Lincoln said " that
you can fool some of the people all of the time, but not all of the people all of the time," Beware of the smooth talker with lack of substance - and lack of focus except to get re-elected. He also knows how to divide and conquer very well !

Reply

News Flash

11:38 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

If the Town wants to vote democrat, then maybe they should pay for it all. We have been paying for the failure Obama for 4 years.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Atlant Schmidt

6:02 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Curious, since he hasn't been President that long!

Kitty Cat

11:39 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Thanks John Waters, for setting the record straight. Neither Bush nor Romney did what Obama did. Let the truth be told.

Reply

Elizabeth Kinross

11:42 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Dear Durham residents- the rest of the nation is watching your petty tantrum over a Presidential security costs. Your state is the one that prides itself in wanting to be the first in the nation to decide primaries because you all are so "smart" and well informed. I think the President should not come to your town and go where he is welcomed. There should be a national boycott of all the restaurants and businesses in your town when the primaries start up again. You want to prove "money talks". The rest of us will show you how it works when the press and political junkies return for the primaries. People will not forget your rudeness.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Wayne Bertrand II

11:45 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Isn't it rude to invite yourself over to someone's home and insist that they pay for you?

Comment_arrow

Becca L.

12:52 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Yes, I think the rest of the nation is watching & congratulating Durham for having the cojones to insist that this CAMPAIGN stop, (not presidential visit), be paid for out of the campaign money. Isn't that what all the fundraising is about? To cover campaign costs?

Comment_arrow

Cheryl Dianne

12:53 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Dear Elizabeth, it is a new low for a campaign to not pay for local security, citing that it's the Secret Service that's requesting the police presence, not the campaign. Good for Durham for not allowing their pocket to be picked. Maybe someone from the campaign will realize that this is counter to their mission and pay their bills.

Comment_arrow

Dennis Taylor

1:46 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Why don't you pay the $30,000 yourself as you seem so adamant that it is the right thing to do!!! Perhaps, it is only the right thing when you can goad others into doing it. This burden belongs soley to the candidate who desires to bless the town with his regal presence. We can all get enough of Barry Soetoro on the internet if we want to hear his noise. That is, if he isn't off on a taxpayer-paid vacation with his brood. And yes, I object to the misuse of Air Force One for vacations by presidents of either party and Pelosi booze rides.

Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

4:00 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

It's not the mayor, it's just Segal and Caroll, they should be embarrassed and asked to step down from their city positions. Shameful!

Wayne Bertrand II

11:43 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The article itself states that the town leaders are willing to pay for a Presidential visit, but not a campaign visit. What some people don't seem to get is the difference. With a Presidential visit, the town has invited him for a function designed to benefit them and money has been set aside specifically to cover the expenses that will be incurred. With a campaign visit, the candidate (even if he is the incumbent President) has asked permission to come for his own benefit (to hopefully persuade people to vote for him again) and the town may not have the money to cover it. Sure the town will get some benefit from a campaign visit, just as the President will get some benefit from a Presidential visit. However, it would seem logical that if the town invites him, they should cover the costs, but if he invites himself, he should cover any extra costs that the town doesn't feel it can afford; and they should be consistent to do this with all candidates (which they claim to have done and without proof to the contrary, I'll have to take their word for it). Whatever any other town feels it can afford or not afford to do is irrelevant, their financial situation isn't necessarily the same. Unless your host insists on covering for you, paying your own way when you invite yourself over is just good manners.

Reply

John

11:43 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Most towns, especially small ones, are going through tough financially times'
The obama campaigns refusal to pay for the added security is CHEAP, ARROGANT and not sharing in the sacrifice.
If it were up to me I would tell him to stay away or simply not supply the added security.

Reply

Duane Wilson

11:44 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Simple solution, if the Government advises a community of there scheduled arrival, the community should advise them that no additional services will be provided for security and that they can pick another town to burden. If you want to play, you have to pay...UP FRONT !

Reply

John Carter

11:47 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

There must not be any businessmen on this towns city council. The revenue brought
in by a event such as this would far outweigh the costs of traffic control, not to mention
the positive publicity for the town. The small town I live in pays to sponsor festivals,
farm shows and fairs, it gladly pays for the associated cost of sponsoring these events.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Becca L.

12:55 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

John, see Wayne Bertrand's response to this at 11:43.

sharon levy

11:49 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

You go John Waters and all who are in support for this town to be reimbursed, look good ole Obama can take airforce one at the tax payers expense , on a date for a movie and dinner, and GET THIS, because of his m............ belief the dog cannot fly with them,,,,,,,,HE IS FLOWN ON A PERSONAL JET,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
and you Karen,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,NO JUST BECAUSE HE IS PRESIDENT, doesn't give him the right to treat the working class people like SLAVES.............

Reply
Comment_arrow

Duane Wilson

11:58 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

It's a "family tradition".

Dane Frederick Hoover

11:50 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

@ Sonia, funny you mention the GOP, and Tea Party doing the same as Obama. No Sonia we paid thousands every protest in fees, permits and details required by cities and towns. You confused us with those scumbag anti wall street free loaders who paid NOTHING but cost tens of millions, while turning our parks into fecal covered drug parties. They never paid permit fees even! Obama like the GOP, and Democrats running regularly do, he should should pay these fees and costs.

Reply

Jan Schmidt

11:57 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

So much hate is such a small state.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cheryl Dianne

12:58 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

People from outside of NH are responding... the story hit the nationals.

Comment_arrow

Atlant Schmidt

6:09 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Cheryl: So once again, nationally, New Hampshire is being to made look like a pack of fools, thanks to our Tea Party kooks?

You'd think that alone would be a reason to eject them from power this November!

Al Smith

11:58 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Sorta stupid of the campaign manager to not pay the $20,000 in order to keep good relationships with the town which in turn would probably buy a some votes. Instead he's going to hack off the town and many of them will vote for somebody else over this.

Reply

Freddy Betty

12:00 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Why the debate. Skip the damn town. Case closed. And for the people who keep bringing Bush up..I'll give you another reason to get pissed. Your still paying him $1.3 million dollars a year in his retirement. And every time he feels it necessary to go put on a bike ride to raise money for soldiers who will never again be able to use a bike (thanks to him), your town is still footing the bill for that security detail too.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cheryl Dianne

1:12 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

And Clinton gets the same. Don't like it? Ask your congressman to change the rules.

Comment_arrow

Eli Jones

1:35 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Bush was 100% better than the idiot occupying the White House now.

Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

7:14 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

Did you say "Bush was a 100% better than the idiot occupying the White House
now"??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
No Eli. That is not true. Because you are not occupying the White House.

Cheryl Dianne

12:00 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

@Deborah Hammer who said...
1:28 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

"Move forward to what? A rich Mormon? excuse my language, but a mormon running this country? Have you lived with them? I'm not prejudice, but I've lived with them neighbor to neighbor and they do NOT accept everyone.. c'mon now..."

Yes, you certainly are "prejudice." We also have Mormon neighbors, and they are wonderful people. Their kids are friends with my kids (we are Catholic) and when I was looking for a job, they were the first ones to offer referrals. Sounds like you have a problem getting along with others who are not "like you." Look inward. People do get the vibes, you know.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sid Guill

12:59 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Cheryl: You are right. I am not a Mormon but the ones I know are all good people. They don't bother me and I don't bother them. Thereare probably a few that are bad. You could say that about any group. I've not seen any one welfare or food stamps. I've never heard of a mormon drunK driving or getting into trouble. As far as people freaking out about romney being rich, where were these people when Kerry ran? He has may times what Romney has. Kerry made his money the hard way too. He had to convince rich women he was a real catch. Romney is bad I guess because he made his creating jobs. Democrats think the government should do that. I didn't vote for Romney in the primary. I thought he was to liberal. But I think he will do a great job. We are lost if Obama gets back in I'm afraid.

joseph phillips

12:02 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

It's really simple Let his group escourt him and be in charge of his safety. let the traffic take it's course if the campaign wont pay for it let him stay away.

Reply

jimmy lee

12:04 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

moochellle and borack are serial leeches of gou mint money. free college,free food while at college, free clothes while at college. the gou mint has paid for their whole lives, they will never change, they do not understand that they and others like them ARE THE PROBLEM.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Atlant Schmidt

6:11 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Is something wrong with your keyboard? You can't seem to spell things correctly.

Comment_arrow

James Fitzgerald

6:23 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

You left out public housing!

Joshua

12:05 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

A presidential visit probably brings in thousands of dollars of added revenue in sales, which benefits local businesses, who pay their workers, who then go out and buy local good and services from other businesses, who pay their workers, who go out and spend that money...and each time this happens the city gets a portion in tax revenue. Get a clue, Durham. $20,000 for a town of well over 200,000 people is nothing. It's a day of planning and a couple of days of overtime.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sid Guill

12:15 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I would doubt the Presidents visit has anything to do with thousands of dollars in added sales. Sales of what? How long will he be there? Peopel aren't goin to spend thousands of dollars because the President is in town for a few hours. Obama has his own security that we the tax payer pay for no matter what . Let him use them. Added sales would have to be in the millions anyway to get back the tax revenue.

Comment_arrow

Wayne Bertrand II

12:42 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Actually, the article states that "Durham is a small town with only about 14,000 residents" not 200,000. I come from a hometown larger than 14,000 and we only had four local business if you didn't count the churches and school (one school for K-12). Three gas stations one and one chicken / burger stand were the whole of our town's commerce. A campaign visit would have given a economic boost to only a handful of people.

Comment_arrow

Becca L.

12:58 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Not a presidential visit, a campaign stop. Big difference.

Carol Schaeffer

12:09 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Easy solution.....no extra police protection.

Reply

judy

12:12 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

why pay for the Police at all He should so next time dont' let them do to him what most want done. Save us money

Reply

Mickey Dee

12:17 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

all of this bickering tsk tsk! what this comes down to is, our so-called President needs to pay up to the city Durham. Just because you are " campaigning" does NOT give you the right to get special treatment! He's the biggest "joke" in our American history! 4 yrs ago the saying was "we need change" well you got your change! not for better but for worse. "We the taxpayers are hurting the most" can not wait till this circus election is over and sees who will drive America further into the rat hole!

Reply

Glen Stanton

12:22 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Why not just leave it up to the elected officials of the city in question. They are the ones responsible for balancing their cities budget. Let them decide if the visit is worth the costs. If you don't agree with their decision, vote them out of office.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James Christensen

1:13 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

In theory your suggestion makes sense, but in reality it won't work. It the town board votes against paying for the visit, and if there is even one Republican on that board, the Liberals will scream racism from every street corner in New Hampshire.

john ward

12:23 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

if obama wanted to use my toliet it would cost him $500,000. TY

Reply

Kelly

12:31 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Silly town.. you think he gives a rats ass how he financially burdens your little town. That's his 'thing', financial burden. Where have you been the last 3+ years?

Reply

Rob

12:34 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Rather than the back end complaining, the city should not have provided the service w/o an up front agreement. I am not an Obama backer but this seems more political posturing than serious fiscal concern. Now I may be wrong but, if so, could one not reasonably question the competence of city management? I mean they must have known and planned in advance. The additional cost, in any private sector company, would be a number well defined, and budgeted.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cheryl Dianne

12:38 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

How would anyone have anticipated that after the precedent of presidential candidates visiting, that a campaign would refuse to pay, citing that it's not the campaign asking for the services... it's the Secret Service? It's a new low, and yet another reason for you to not be an "Obama backer."

Elizabeth Kinross

12:43 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I think all outsiders have to do is scroll through the comments to realize it's not just about the economics of a Presidential visit. There's some heavy duty hate in Durham. It's not enough to respectfully disagree politically. No. The people of Durham have to show infantile pettiness mixed with scatological fixations to express yourselves. America is watching. You people are turning into southern Rednecks.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cheryl Dianne

12:48 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Elizabeth this is a national story. People from all over the country are responding on this site. I'm from California. The local people I've seen have been articulate and reasoned... except for the woman who hates Mormons.

Comment_arrow

Becca L.

1:02 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

And I'm from Illinois. Still ticked off at the extra police protection required so Obama could go to his girlfriend (Valerie Jarrett) daughter's wedding while multiple deaths were taking place elsewhere in the city because the police force is stretched too thin.

Comment_arrow

Wayne Bertrand II

1:03 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Actually, all we have to go on about the town of Durham itself is the article (anyone can claim to be from there in a post) and there is nothing there to indicate any kind of "heavy duty hate in Durham." However, using the the phrase "You people are turning into southern Rednecks" does indeed sound hateful, not just to Durham. I am from a small town in Southern Louisiana and, yes, many of my friends and family (and myself) can fit into the category covered by the term redneck and it is not appreciated to see it used as a derogatory remark intended to refer to "heavy duty hate."

Tony C

12:44 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The reason he is not paying the bill is it is a bad investment for a town with so few people and so few electoral votes

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sawyer

12:53 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

New Hampshire won't see it that way...LOL

John Hannon-Connecticut

12:49 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Obama neegro pay for a bill? FAT CHANCE. Typical colored boy... use things for free and sit on the throne of his dictatorship. Obama is a useless socialistis dictator.

Reply
Comment_arrow

ForThePeople

12:53 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

And this is a Republican nowadays.

Don't vote for this garbage bigotry crap in November. Shame on you John.

Comment_arrow

Cheryl Dianne

12:55 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Blue states aren't supposed to have bigot, John from Connecticut.

Comment_arrow

emily

1:07 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

totally agree, especially with the last 3 words,

Comment_arrow

Eli Jones

1:19 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

John, you are correct about Obama being a parasite and a dictator. We The People will vote the creep out on 11-6-12.

Comment_arrow

David Crossgrove

5:06 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

John Hannon-Connecticut - spews the following: "Obama neegro pay for a bill? FAT CHANCE. Typical colored boy... use things for free and sit on the throne of his dictatorship. Obama is a useless socialistis dictator."

Could it be said that your mother was a useless sperm repository? We see the results of THAT mistake,

Comment_arrow

Atlant Schmidt

6:17 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

And Republicans deny that racism is part of their motivation for hating Obama!

By the way, there's no such word as "socialistis".

Comment_arrow

Keith F Thompson

2:30 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Please tell me again how the right wing is not racist. You keep letting it slip. 
The President of the United States is African-American, from a mixed race marriage, from a working class family. He has an African American wife and two African American daughters. They live at the White House, with his African American mother in law. His Attorney General is African American. He has appointed two women to the Supreme Court, one Jewish and one Hispanic American. The Secretary of State is a woman, and the wife of the last President who had to live with this level of hatred. 
All in all, people like you should have died of a stroke by now. It must be so hard for you, to wake up every day and realize all the above is true. No wonder you can't even summon the most basic human decency. That's just me being a typical liberal, having sympathy for another undeserving low-life.

Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

7:48 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

John is a sick deranged person.

Sawyer

12:52 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Is Obama campaigning for Romney in New Hampshire?....LOL

Reply

Hardy Har Har Har

12:54 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

If he cannot do a budget in 4 years for the country, why should anyone expect him to figure out the burden on a small Town he is causing.

Reply

Timothy Harden

12:56 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Thats $30,000 for jokes that are not funny. Joke is on Durham.

Reply

Ben Novick

12:58 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Hey folks! Interesting situation. If local law enforcement won't be there to supplement the SS, the SS will recommnd against the President going to that locale. P. Obama won't have personal contact there so no star struck people who could vote for him. This would be true with any president. It kind of pays for him to be there so, POTUS should pay, not the local municpality that doesn't get anything out of it. It's like "Want my autograph? It costs $30,000.00". I'd rether have Emmy Lou Harris or the hero pilot Sully's autograph.

Reply
Comment_arrow

emily

1:08 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The autograph of Mickey Mouse would be good enough

airstamper

1:02 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I remember GHW Bush coming here to my town of Fort Myers, FL. This was after he lost the election to Clinton. I saw this huge 747 sitting at the local airport ( as a employee of the largest airline that had given up its 747's because of the huge gas guzzling capabilities that 4 engines use) and thought a flight from Washington DC to Florida uses more gas on takeoff and landing than inflight with this plane. He was going on vcation to Boca Grande to go fishing. He lost the election and had to get in one more vacation.
Helicopter to Boca Grande from the airport too.
This is what happens with our Presidents when campaigning and apparently after campaigning. It's too bad Durham doesn't want to pay for this historical visit by a President..must be pretty common place for them to get a President to come to their town.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cheryl Dianne

1:09 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

What is your point? Should we not have paid for Obama to fly to NYC to take his wife on a date? We always pay for Air Force One. This is about a presidential campaign stop, which the campaign is supposed to pay for.

Comment_arrow

emily

1:09 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The town just does not want obama, period.

Comment_arrow

airstamper

4:03 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

My point is that EVERY President in office has the "spoils". As an incubent President, GWBush came here 3 times and snarled up traffic for hours to get campaign money from his wealthy friends in Naples. There was no payment to the town for extra security juast as there was no extra payment for John McCain when he came here. We are Americans, REMEMBER? We respect our President even though you don't like their political party or are not a member of it.
To think a President of this country should get an OK from his people to go on a date, is absurd. Maybe all Presidents should only be allowed to come out of the Whitehouse , once a month. Start a petition.

Sawyer

1:04 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

We should thank Obama and the Democrats for finally showing the people they don't have a clue about the economics of money. Once the who country hears this, it's time to vote.

Reply

emily

1:05 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The town should just not offer any security if they don't get paid.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Trey

1:32 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Exactly, before I noticed your comment, I said the same exact thing, too!

achmed

1:07 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Wow! All we ever hear from the libs is how Mitt Romney and all the rest of the Republicans are out of touch with the people. Not Obama and Co. Noooooo, they seriously identify with the 99%ers. Wake up, pups! The party is over, and it now high-time to pay the piper. That's what happens when you sell your soul to the devil.

Reply

News Flash

1:07 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Durham voted 75% Democrat the last election. Durham you people got duped.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Atlant Schmidt

6:27 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

There's a well-demonstrated correlation between higher intelligence and a tendency towards liberalism. So it shouldn't be surprising to you that the home of our state university didn't vote for the Tea Party.

And they probably won't vote for the Tea Party this time either, sorry!

Eli Jones

1:15 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The town of Durham should just refuse to provide security for the imposter in chief and announce their decision to all of the town and county residents. Make Obama and his tribe that they are on their own. Problem solved.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Atlant Schmidt

6:30 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

"Tribe"? Thanks for once again proving the point that it's racism behind much of the hatred of Obama!

Comment_arrow

Keith F Thompson

2:28 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Please tell me again how the right wing is not racist. You keep letting it slip. 
The President of the United States is African-American, from a mixed race marriage, from a working class family. He has an African American wife and two African American daughters. They live at the White House, with his African American mother in law. His Attorney General is African American. He has appointed two women to the Supreme Court, one Jewish and one Hispanic American. The Secretary of State is a woman, and the wife of the last President who had to live with this level of hatred. 
All in all, people like you should have died of a stroke by now. It must be so hard for you, to wake up every day and realize all the above is true. No wonder you can't even summon the most basic human decency. That's just me being a typical liberal, having sympathy for another undeserving low-life.

joe blow

1:18 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

new hamshire is one of the most important states to win in a presidential election. if the obama people are not willing to pick up the tab for the o.t. for the security they need, then i hope it impacts him in the polls. its his personal wish to become president again, why should he freeload on us tax payers? for all campaigns going forward, the rule should be the candidate to foots the bill with his own money.

Reply

Eli Jones

1:22 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I left out the word "know" between tribe and that. Sorry!

Reply

Tony Jacik

1:31 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

With all the millions raised every month by the President for re-election I think a measly $30,000 is nothing and they should pay weather it be Obama or any other prez. Why should the tax payers foot the bill? If I was the mayor I would give every police officer the day off that Obama was in town and let the secret service do the protection. As bad off as towns and cities are financially they should pay for their visit.

Reply

Trey

1:31 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

In the end, it's tax payers that pay. Anyway, New Hampshire should just not provide him security if the federal government wants to be that way.

Reply

Roy K. McGinnis

1:32 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Durham, don't supply anything they don't pay for. If Obama comes, he already has the USA paying for his transportation for his campaigning and all you hear is how much money his campaign has raised. I see NYC placed at a standstill when he "Graces" us with his presence. Five minute stop at ground zero (three and a half years into his presidency) then off to a five star lunch and a Broadway play. (AT the tax payers expense) Let them pay for everything!

Reply

Dennis Taylor

1:38 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

i mentioned in a an earlier post that "it's Obama's skin and he should pay to protect it." Of course, in this insane nation of hypersensitive people, this was interpreted as a racial remark. I used the word skin to get down to basics. If Obama or any other "leader" wants to protest him or herself on a campaign visit, they need to foot the bill. They are the ones getting something out of the visit. The question of whether it is at all ethical for a man working one job, while being paid for that job, to take time off to get another job remains. It may be how everyone does it, but it stinks for the peons paying for the waste

Reply
Comment_arrow

Keith F Thompson

2:27 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Dennis, you're right. I was wrong to imply that you are a racist. I should have stated it outright. You are a racist, and a homophobe. There, feel better?

John

1:38 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

It would surely be a shame for the Obama camp to have to foot this bill since
they have had so much trouble getting donations.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

4:12 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

didn't hear you whining about Bush's campaign trail visits when he was running for re-election....oh wait, you must be part of the Tea Party, they also didn't say a word when Bush spent three trillion dollars, but when Obama won, all of a sudden they cared about the debt. If it was princess Diana or any other celebrity, they'd be fighting to pay the 30K, only two people in the town are whining, thank goodness the mayor knows what kind of publicity this will bring and $$$$ to their area! Do you realize how much press will eat there, get hotels, etc. Glad you are not in charge of running a town or a n event.

Dennis Taylor

1:38 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

This is not an issue of whether I like or dislike the fraud in the White House. I think Bush was an idiot for not responding properly to 9/11 and continuing to read a children's book to a class for several minutes after he was informed. Durham has no obligation to allow for events that can cause damage to persons and property. It needs a fee schedule to cover the costs of police. If it does not have one in place, the town father's have no right to spend money that has not been allocated by the people of Durham to protect his majesty from the people he "serves."

Reply

Lorraine Mabbett

1:38 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

WOW! Maybe the city of Los Angeles will get reimbursed for the cost everytime comes to town to raise $15million dollars. The first time he came to raise funds "at a private home" he had an entourage DRIVE from LAX airport to mid city between 4-6pm. Yes you read correctly. This little escapade cost driver 3 to 4 hours as they were gridlocked - unable to go anywhere. The little episode has been repeated again and again. And already three times this year. The backlash has been so bad the "candidate" realizes it is best he fly into the smaller Bob Hope (Burbank) airport and therefore reduce the time on roads. Nevertheless, it is 100 times as costly as the Durham fiasco.

Reply

Underwater Couple

1:39 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Obama has been annoying the entire state since the beggining of the year for only 4 electoral votes. No Town deserves this amount of disrespect with all the money democrats are throwing around.

Reply
Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

7:19 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

But Mitt "Corporations are People" Romney’s many trips to this State with the lousy 4 electoral votes on the other hand, let me guess- not annoying at all right? Yes that’s
what I thought.

ToWittandTherefore

1:48 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

HA HA HA, Not only a socialist, but a deadbeat to boot. Sue him for the money, the campaign rules are clear. Now, he's giving the citizens the bumns rush!

Folks, before noBama comes to your city or town, get the money up front. Or, you'll never get a cent. A dollar down and a dollar when you catch me, during a recession? He's a fool and so are the people that will do it for him. And he has the gull to speak about our enconomy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack Jery

1:58 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

That idea would be excellent BUT ... there is the DOJ ran by his faithful accomplice - the capo-di-capo-tutti of Obama's thugery - Mr. Eric Holder.
Justice can't prevail here as long as these gangsters work together the way they do.

CJ Mayes

1:51 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Looks like another town of many that just don't want Obama!

Reply

Jack Jery

1:51 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Just "pay him back" in November, people of NH. Show him the door and send him 'packing'.

Reply

James Fitzgerald

1:56 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The purpose of the trip is to "raise money for his re election" isn't it? What is the money spent on if not a "valid" campaign expense.? The cost of a venue I believe is a valid campaign expense. BTW a couple of months ago Obama went to Newport Beach, CA to raise money. (G. Clooney's doing). The town was out of pocket $35,000 and allegedly was to bill the campaign. Newport Beach is an inordinately wealthy bastion. If they coudn't afford it why should this town.

He is spending more time campaigning then governing. Why do we pay for this?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

4:11 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

didn't hear you whining about Bush's campaign trail visits when he was running for re-election....oh wait, you must be part of the Tea Party, they also didn't say a word when Bush spent three trillion dollars, but when Obama won, all of a sudden they cared about the debt. If it was princess Diana or any other celebrity, they'd be fighting to pay the 30K, only two people in the town are whining, thank goodness the mayor knows what kind of publicity this will bring and $$$$ to their area! Do you realize how much press will eat there, get hotels, etc. Glad you are not in charge of running a town or a n event.

Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

4:25 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

No, this is not a fundraiser, it is a campaign speech.

Bob Samson

1:59 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Obamas "War Against NH Towns".

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

4:10 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

didn't hear you whining about Bush's campaign trail visits when he was running for re-election....oh wait, you must be part of the Tea Party, they also didn't say a word when Bush spent three trillion dollars, but when Obama won, all of a sudden they cared about the debt. If it was princess Diana or any other celebrity, they'd be fighting to pay the 30K, only two people in the town are whining, thank goodness the mayor knows what kind of publicity this will bring and $$$$ to their area!

Comment_arrow

Lot2Learn

6:24 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Bob
Are you kidding me?! Obama's "War Against NH Towns". You are pathetic. Because one town in NH can't afford to pay for extra police security that may be required for the President is a war against NH towns. With the economy, believe me, I certainly understand why they may not want to foot the bill, or can't afford to foot the bill, but to turn this into a war on NH towns is just ridiculous. It's this sort of thinking that perpetuates ignorance. "War on NH Towns" Bob, Really? Pick another fight because this one is not worth it. "War on NH Towns" Oh My, what will you come up with next. I can't wait the read your next round of brilliance. You Go Bob!!!!!!

KoC

2:06 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

It's simple. Announce to the town that there will not be additional security provided and attendance will be at their own risk and subject to Secret Service "discretion." Our President is already secure. And in such a small homogenous town, it is doubtful a riot will ensue.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

4:10 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Exeter offered to host him, mayor said no. I didn't hear you whining about Bush's campaign trail visits when he was running for re-election....oh wait, you must be part of the Tea Party, they also didn't say a word when Bush spent three trillion dollars, but when Obama won, all of a sudden they cared about the debt. If it was princess Diana or any other celebrity, they'd be fighting to pay the 30K, only two people in the town are whining, thank goodness the mayor knows what kind of publicity this will bring and $$$$ to their area!

Therese Reynolds

2:07 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Please excuse any typo's i was blessed with poor eyesight and hearing, that being said, I was 6 when JFK was assinated, so i've been around awhile and I have never seen a president or his wife spend so much and watch the country they are sworn to protect make do with so little. I think this visit should be paid for with campagne funds, I always thought this is what the funds were to be used for, as far as the Secret Service, it's their job to protect the president, therefore, the bill should fall on them, not the town. But that's just my opinion.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Trudy Peters

2:10 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Exactly .....................

Trudy Peters

2:07 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The DNC, or campaign should pay for his visit. It was not a Presidential visit. It was a campaign visit. How dare taxpayers have to pay for his re-election campaign. Nobody wants the fool anymore. Bad enough we paid milions for his campaign vehicle.
While he is campaigning and not visiting on Presidential business he should pay. No one has the funds anymore to give him a free ride. Although he is clueless the private sector is not doing fine. And the cities today are in financial jeopardy. All thanks to Obama Presidency.

If this was once the practice, (cities paying for Presidents campaign stumping) it needs to end ...Now!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

4:09 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

didn't hear you whining about Bush's campaign trail visits when he was running for re-election....oh wait, you must be part of the Tea Party, they also didn't say a word when Bush spent three trillion dollars, but when Obama won, all of a sudden they cared about the debt. If it was princess Diana or any other celebrity, they'd be fighting to pay the 30K, only two people in the town are whining, thank goodness the mayor knows what kind of publicity this will bring and $$$$ to their area!

Comment_arrow

Lot2Learn

6:09 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Trudy
What's lost in all of this is that everybody seems to be forgetting that he is still the President. Is he suppose to give up his vehicle, plane and all the other things that come with being a President because he campaigning to be re-elected. I have NEVER, NEVER heard those kinds of comments about ANY other President running for re-election. But because it's him, it's the most God awful thing he could do. Get real Trudy. I've asked the question so many times in the past three years to so many people and now I'm asking you. The President only has the power veto or sign a bill. He does not write them. How many of the republican bills has he vetoed? What has the republican done to help the economy in the pass three years? Their response to EVERYTHING this President has proposed with nothing in it's place except bills that will enrich the rich and take away from the poor. Who's passing bills on what women can do with their bodies, not the President. Do me a favor, for you and all those people who say this President hasn't done anything, go on line a read the bills that he has passed. But of course, you won't do that because that would mean that you and the others would have to admit that he has brought us a long ways from 2009. It's not where we could be, and he admits that, but we have come a long way, whether you all will admit it or not. The truth is the truth, even though you don't want the truth because it's easier to put the blame on him.

Comment_arrow

Atlant Schmidt

6:42 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

You know, it's a funny thing: just last week, I got a mailing from Charlie Bass that was sent under his frank (that is to say, paid by us) but was entirely campaign-oriented. Are you equally outraged about that?

Comment_arrow

Trudy Peters

11:27 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Sonia Bush paid for his campaigning with campaign funds, as everyone has before Obama. And he had a several million dollar bus created for his campaigning on our dime unlike any other President has done. The usual Presidential vehicles just didn't suffice for his majesty. As for spending Obama has spent more than all past President's combined, and still spending at full tilt.

Comment_arrow

Trudy Peters

11:37 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Lot2Learn, As for his record, he has passed bills and regulations that stifle business growth which results in job loss. He has blocked oil drilling which means we pay others (mostly we supply money for our enemies to attack us) instead of providing for ourselves.

His federal agents have repeatedly raid Gibson Guitar company. On suspicion of illegal wood. They have confiscated wood delaying production. Even though no illegal activity has ever been found. The CEO was informed that if he moved his work force to Madagascar, he would be harassment free. That is an intentional attempt to drive a business out of the country and forced job loss. We do not know how many instances of this kind have happened. I know people who haven't worked in two years.

To defend him and say he has done anything of any worth of beneficial meaning to this country is beyond the pale. Obama has yet to utter any truth since day one. He has secreted all his records unlike any President before him,. Of course school records such as Harvard with the foreign student stamp right on it, would have been an obstacle he could have never hurdled.

Other Presidents used Presidential vehicles. But didn't spend Millions of taxpayer dollars for a tricked out campaign Bus. A little palin envy perhaps.

Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

8:56 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Dear Trudy Peters, if you are going to spread lies about Bush paying for his own campaign stops security, I think you should go blog on Faux news. Back your statements with some facts and maybe you'll be taken seriously.
http://www.wisconsinreporter.com/wi-police-protect-presidential-candidates-taxpayers-stuck-with-the-bill

john wright

2:09 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

obummer and that gang of dead beats should be made to pay if not make them unwelcome.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

4:08 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I didn't hear you whining about Bush's campaign trail visits when he was running for re-election....oh wait, you must be part of the Tea Party, they also didn't say a word when Bush spent three trillion dollars, but when Obama won, all of a sudden they cared about the debt.

Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

4:23 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Certainly,
If you want to act like a child and force your bills on the President, go ahead. but do it up front, not two days before the event. This is just cheap Right wing politics.

Comment_arrow

Lot2Learn

5:49 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

John
If that's the attitude of folks in Durham, NH, and I'm sure it's not, they would most certainly make them unwelcome.

Joan Dowd

2:09 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

With all of our tax money that is being sent to Kenya, you would think that the President could at least pay his own way within his own Country. If any town or city pays the way without being paid back it should then be in the catagory of a "Presidental Gift" with a big big tax reduction for every citizen in that town. Also, the President should have to pay a "Gift Tax" on this money even though he did not receive it personally.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

4:22 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

President Barack Obama did save the economy from collapse, putting a couple of cops on traffic duty is the least they could do.

Comment_arrow

Keith F Thompson

2:24 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Please tell me again how the right wing is not racist. You keep letting it slip. 
The President of the United States is African-American, from a mixed race marriage, from a working class family. He has an African American wife and two African American daughters. They live at the White House, with his African American mother in law. His Attorney General is African American. He has appointed two women to the Supreme Court, one Jewish and one Hispanic American. The Secretary of State is a woman, and the wife of the last President who had to live with this level of hatred. 
All in all, people like you should have died of a stroke by now. It must be so hard for you, to wake up every day and realize all the above is true. No wonder you can't even summon the most basic human decency. That's just me being a typical liberal, having sympathy for another undeserving low-life.

Hardy Har Har Har

2:11 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The Prez wants our 4 electoral votes, pay for them.

Hardy Har Har Har

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

4:08 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

didn't hear you whining about Bush's campaign trail visits when he was running for re-election....oh wait, you must be part of the Tea Party, they also didn't say a word when Bush spent three trillion dollars, but when Obama won, all of a sudden they cared about the debt.

Eli Jones

2:14 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

O joy! My legacy has been saved by Barack Obama! I will not be remembered as the worst buffoon in the oval office. I think I’ll take the day off to lust in my heart. At my age, that’s the best I can do.....Jimmy Carter

Reply

rick barasso

2:18 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Perhaps our nations President, who some forget, was elect by the majority of voters in this country, should go to Loudon to see the races. Instead of Durham to see the racists. The politics in NH is becoming the laughing stock of the nation. An amazing feat for such a small state. Oh, and some of you are really going to hate this comment. A state which brings so little to the table of the nation as a whole. There is a reason politicians only show up in NH is at election time. It is because it is so inconsequential. So leaders of the metropolis of Durham instead of charging OUR President for visiting your town, you welcome him with open arms, as the only thing Durham has to offer the state is turning out educated citizens. And Obama has made it easier for these students to attend school and be insured on their parents policies while attending. Let's not forget, many of the Police that will be on duty securing the President will be there because his stimulas package saved their jobs.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eli Jones

2:40 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

rick, the race card has been used and abused by the Obama zombies and it is now worn out and has lost all credibility. No one is buying what you are selling, namely, if you don't love Obama , you are a racist. Seriously, while playing the race card may seem politically correct, it is in reality laughable.

Hardy Har Har Har

2:35 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The Prez is losing lots of NH votes on this. He deserves it to.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

4:07 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I didn't hear you whining about Bush's campaign trail visits when he was running for re-election....oh wait, you must be part of the Tea Party, they also didn't say a word when Bush spent three trillion dollars, but when Obama won, all of a sudden they cared about the debt.

Comment_arrow

Lot2Learn

5:44 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Hardy Har Har Har
Is he losing votes, or is that just what you hope. How many people in NH have you talked to in order to know this. Let's be factual. Don't just put out a statement like that because you don't like the President. Let me understand, you've talked to everybody in NH who's not voting for the Prez, cause you know it could just be your little circle of friends and acquaintances.

Edward

2:35 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Hell if I would want to pay for him to "kiss the babies"...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lot2Learn

4:13 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Edward
Just in case you didn't know. Nobody pays for the President to "kiss the babies". People come to him to have him kiss their babies. I've never heard of any President who goes out for the sole purpose of "kissing the babies" Any baby that's kissed by any President is because the parents want him too not because it's being paid for. Can we stop the ignorance.

MiMi

2:36 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The political party should be RESPONSIBLE for any expense which occurs when any candidate goes anywhere.....good grief....what is wrong with these people??????

Reply

RandyJevne

2:39 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

If we protected him like he protects the constitution and the country.
Well, guess what.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

4:20 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The country has never been safer

Comment_arrow

Lot2Learn

5:39 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Randy, Randy, Randy
Don't get caught up in the nonsense. You're smarter than that.

Reggie

2:51 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Shame on the democrats, cant you ever pay your way. Why do you require somebody else to pay all the time. It never ends.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lot2Learn

3:56 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Reggie
Do you know what the procedure is for whether or not the candidate is responsible for paying those fees? Probably not, do you know whether any republican has ever gone to Durham and refused/ or even paid for security? Probably not. And unless you run the books in Durham, you wouldn't know, but that does not matter to you because anything and everything that's wrong with the country is the democrats fault. For your information - no one political party runs this country.

Comment_arrow

Lot2Learn

5:09 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Reggie
You're right, it never ends because republicans take any little thing dealing with this President and try to make it seem like it's the end of the world. I hope he never reveals what sort of toothpaste he uses, because I'm sure you guys would find a way to make it seem like he's responsible for utting the other paste brand out of business. Does that sound silly and petty? Exactly! That's what you sound with some of the childish, idiotic remarks you jump on just to have something negative to say about this President. I don't remember when it was but I know this issue came up in another primary and I didn't hear any uproar then. It can happen to anybody else at any other time but it's only a problem if it's him. So sad.

s. savoy

2:57 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Free condoms are not free. Taxpayers pay for that. Now taxpayers have to foot the bill for Obamas Billion Dollar campaign. Geez

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lot2Learn

3:50 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Sam Savoy,
Where is the outrage for the taxpayers paying billions and billions for 2 wars that should not happen. Oh but we don't won't to talk about that. It's more important for you to complain about anything this President does big or small. Oh my goodness, what are we going to do the President is using Cottonelle instead of Charmin, call FOX news.

Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

4:06 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I didn't hear you whining about Bush's campaign trail visits when he was running for re-election....oh wait, you must be part of the Tea Party, they also didn't say a word when Bush spent three trillion dollars, but when Obama won, all of a sudden they cared about the debt.

James Fitzgerald

3:08 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

As a former New England resident I am reminded of your state motto
"Live Free or Die". I applaud your stalwart ways and encourage you to stand firm.
Is there any reason that the campaign won't pay? It is bad enough that the taxpayer is paying O's salary for all his campaigning and getting no value for our tax money. It is not the responsibility of the local taxpayer to "subsidize" his campaign. The campaign is about "raising money" to spend on the campaign. Let them throw some your way.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lot2Learn

5:37 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

James
O's campaign is paid by donors. I'm sure if the President chose to fly on American airlines of JetBlue they would be paying for that too. Americans are the only people who complains that the President flies in a plane designated for the President. He seems to be the only President that is wrong for using the Presidential plane. You people are something else.

Therese Reynolds

3:09 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Rick B, in the state of Indiana we parents have to pay for the books our kid's use and they have to returned after each semester. We also have to supply Kleexex, hand sanitzer, paper towels AND all the other school supplies, pens, pencils and such. Now my husband and I are paying close to 50,000.00 a year for our youngest child to attend college, How is Obama making it easier on us. Durham, NH should NOT have to pay for him, and I don't think Durham is a racist town. Maybe your confusing NH with another state.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

4:05 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Obama is trying to prevent republicans from doubling your interest rate, if you don't start paying attention, it will happen soon and you won't even realize that you voted for the Republicans who did that to your kids. How about the fact that if your college kid doesn't have health insurance or a job, they can still be on their parents. Education education education, get a clue, Obama is doing his best to help everyone. Now what do you think the unemployment rate would be now if the banks failed and car industry failed? Can you do the math?

Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

4:19 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

They don't have books in Indiana....

Comment_arrow

Lot2Learn

5:32 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Therese
Indiana is not the only state where this is happening. Did you just start buying these supplies in the last 3 years? I remember having to buy those things for my 16 year old grandson when he was in kindergarten 12 years ago. Was President Obama responsible for it then to? President Obama didn't cut the school budget, you have to look in your own back yard to see who did that. Now I will admit that the economy may have something to do with what's going on in our school systems today, but all that is not his blame either. When you can an economy that crashes and a congress who want to do absolutely nothing to get it back on track who do you blame. College has always been expensive. you can't possibly be blaming the President for how much you are paying for college fees. College fees have always been a problem. That's the colleges making a profit, not the President. But of course, he has power over what we pay colleges that we send our children to. What I didn't hear you say is that he signed a bill to delay repayment, cut interest rates and take the middle man out of getting a student loan so it's not so expensive. Of course not, that means you would have to acknowledge an accomplishment. God forbid. This man can't get credit for anything. He's dong so badly that governors are being told not to say that their states economy is getting better. WOW.

my name

3:11 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The entire obama administration is a disgrace. He, he, made me sick.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Crossgrove

3:52 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

my name says "The entire obama administration is a disgrace. He, he, made me sick."

I ask ... got health insurance??

Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

4:03 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

"My Name" and Eli, That's great, so much reasoning behind those statements...playgrounds are on other sites. If you want to talk to adults, then speak like adults and give reasons. My five year old could give a reason why he likes or doesn't like someone; and my five year old doesn't call people names. Try harder...boring.

Comment_arrow

Josef Muller

4:04 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I hope you never get healthy again you are sick born

Comment_arrow

Donna

5:53 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

David,
I have insurance. I have worked for 37 years and always had insurance. If I wanted birth control I didnt ask for taxpayers to pay. I worked for my insurance, I paid it myself. If I was sick I paid for my medicine along with my insurance. What has happened to this country's self worth? Why is it that we have to pay for everyone else now? Yes there are exceptions, heartbreaking ones, but in general we have become the country of entitlement. For all the liberal wealthy celebrities and other liberal wealth, donate to organizations ,all you want ,to take care of the ones who have needs, I believe that's what makes the heart feel good, not being told that we have to. I have two grown children and they have been raised to count on themselves for what they need not the government. The government is to protect us and keep the check and balances. Not to tell me what I can eat, drive, think....

Lot2Learn

3:13 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Here we go again. I get so sick and tired of those people who respond to blogs and take the opportunity to speak of everything but what the subjeIct really is. Everything is not always democrat or republican. It is a small town, and being a part of the current economy and what we dealt with in late 2009, it may very well be a financial burden for Durham. Who should pay for it, I don'thave the answer to that. And for those of you who don't know or don't want to know, being President does come with it's perks. Some are for some reason more troublesome than others because of who's taking them. In this case, because it's President Obama, it's just the worst thing in the world. Before you go off on a tandrum about the vacations they are taking, check out the number of vacations he's taken in the past three years to the number the President Bush took during the same time period in his presidency. I guess he and his family are suppose to fly coach. Give me a break people. Really?!! The subject is who should foot the bill not anything else. But the thing that annoys me most is those people who won't bother to research and find out the truth for themselves. It is so easy to sit on the side lines and play quarterback. Even those people in the senate, house of representatives and congress have never been the President. We can all say what he/she should do, I'd like to see you do it.

Reply

SHARON

3:18 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Could they not say no to the secret service, tell them to bring more of their own?

Reply

Lot2Learn

3:26 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

My name. Does he make you sick or his policies. Have you ever met him and sat down to have a conversation with him? Or are you one of those people who can't distinguish the two?

Reply

Denise

3:28 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

So the town wants money to pay for security? What small town of 14K has that kind of money to throw around, not many that I know of. And if the secret service is doing security for campaign visits. Is the Dem party paying for that bill? I am not sure tax payer money should be paying for campaign visits. They need to separate out the presidents official duties and campaign stops so tax payers aren't paying for a campaign.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Atlant Schmidt

6:56 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Does the phrase "Mission Accomplished" ring any bells with you?

Bob

3:31 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Every time a politician comes into town, that town has the right to expect to be paid back for any services they render to the politician that is asked for or demanded. The President is no different. I live on the west coast and times are tough out here and we cannot afford to just be picking up the expenses of every willy nilly politician who decides they need to make an appearance to further their agenda and not ours. Continue to bill him and take him to court. Make it a public embarrassment for him and get your money. Your people need it more than he does. He raised $27,000,000 in california in one money from wealthy friends so he can afford to pay the bill. Get some of that Hollywood liberal money back to spend on your children adn people where it belongs.

Reply

Lot2Learn

3:42 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

James Fitzgerald. Why do you and others keep complaining about taxpayers paying the president's salary. He is not the only President that we've paid their salary. We pay every President's salary. I never hear you complaining about the Senate or any of the other branches that the taxpayers pay their salary and they actually work less than 3 months a year. Is that okay? If you're going to complaining about one you should complain about them all. Oh but you won't do that because it's this President. Let me be the first to say that if you ran for President that I would be the first to vote for you because you wouldn't want my tax dollars to pay your salary and you certainly wouldn't use any of the perks that come with it. James Fitzgerald for President!!!!!!

Reply

Kathleen Barngrover

3:45 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Whose job is it to protect the citizens of Durham, NH? The President has Secret Service detail to proect him and his family. Why should the Secret Service be protecting Durham and why should the President pay for the city or town of Durham to protect the citizens of Durham? Yeah things are tight all over, we know, but why would any town want to be known as the town that refused to protect their own citizens and town that refused a presidential visit because they didn't want to pay their officers overtime? Throw a bakesale, that's what we educators do when we need pencils and paper.

Reply

Eli Jones

3:46 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

lot2learn, because Obama is worthless and we want him gone. Come 11-6-12, we will vote the creep out.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

4:15 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

"Obama" is the President of the United States.

Comment_arrow

David Crossgrove

4:50 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I am not as forgiving as Lot2Learn is regarding responding to an idiot.
You are full to bursting with bovine poo. Get on that plow-horse you rode into town on and just leave!

salemvoter

3:58 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The organization that invited or organized the visit should pay for the police detail, since its a campaign event, not an event of national security. We had to pay for police details at both daughters weddings because we had over 100 guests

Reply
Comment_arrow

Wayne Bertrand II

4:34 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The article says that the town didn't invite the President, his campaign did.

Comment_arrow

David Crossgrove

4:46 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Where the President goes outside the White House property is ALWAYS a matter of National Security. Don't forget this fact.

Mike Healey

4:14 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Just another small town shake down.
Now that all the plans have been made they want to strong arm the president for more money?

Reply

Lot2Learn

4:27 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Eli Jones
It is so easy to say the race card is not being used because you have no idea what is to be an African American. I don't know why it is that non-African Americans are so quick to say it has nothing to do with race. You tell me what other President, republican or democrat, that has been subjected to the name calling and the disrespect this President has endured over the past four years. Only those people who participate in, whether it's thinking it or acting on it, would say it's not a race issue. Now, I will agree that not everything may be about race, but unfortunately too much of it is and if you were an honest person you would see it. Although it is 2012, mayb unfortunately in 2012, there is still a lot of racism in America and it will always be there as long as people like you try to deny that it is. I am by no means calling you or anyone else a racist, because I don't know you, but trying to deny that a lot of what's happening to this President is racist. We can't fix what we don't acknowledge it.

Reply

Lot2Learn

4:37 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Russell Odone
NO president has squandered more money that this President?! Reminder - Clinton left office with a surplus, Bush left office with a deficit caused mainly by 2 unnecessary wars, by the way, that we are still paying for. Really Russell?!

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Crossgrove

4:43 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Lot2Learn - so good to read a VoR ... voice of reason here and huffpo!

Fran James

4:45 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

When the Republicans were campaigning in this state and probably this city, did they have to foot the police overtime’s bill? On June 15th, who foot the police overtime for the Special Event with Mitt Romney? Who foot the police overtime when the "Every Town Counts" bus tour of Mitt Romney came into New Hampshire? Did the Republican mayor of Manchester bill the Republican candidates when they were campaigning in Manchester, New Hampshire? Did DURHAM’s TOWN COUNCIL bill Ron Paul when he held the Durham New Hampshire Town Hall Meeting on 1/06/2012? What is the political affiliation of Durham’s town council? They have showed their true “color” by their action. The lack of respect that "these people" have shown our president is disgraceful. You cannot win this election fairly, so you have sunk to a new low. You are beneath contempt. Thanks for the head up, I can now scratch off the town of Durham from my list of cities to visit. President Obama’s campaign team do not spend an extra cent in this city, however everyone else descend on this city on that day and make the police work for their money then never visit or buy anything from that city again. I am sorry Governor John Lynch, but University of New Hampshire has been scratch from my recommended college list.

Reply

Jan Schmidt

4:54 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Dear Patch... I think its time you started using Facebook login to comment. People are abusing your site and each other - and there's nothing like losing your mask to make you behave like a grown-up.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sue Mercier Vail

8:43 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Jan, thanks for pointing this out. I hate to see the fb buy-in but on the other hand this is not civilized discourse.

Lot2Learn

4:59 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Hugh Jazzoul
You all want us to stop blaming Bush, but you all don't want to admit that it was the Buah administration that got us in to this mess. You don't want to admit that the Republican congress has said no to everything thing this President has proposed. Even those things that before he became President they were all for. What about that Hugh? For the last 3 years all we've heard is that is that the rich people are the job creaters so we can't cut their taxes, okay, the President extended their taxes, but there are still millions of people that are not working. They haven't created a single job and they (the republicans) are steady cutting public jobs putting more people in the unemployment lines. What about that Hugh? This President may not have been able to accomlplish that he promised but all the blame does not fall on him. Tell me anything the congress has done to help better his country. A congress that has only passed a little over 100 bills in the last 3 years when normally that amount is passed within the first year. They've used everything from changing with the number for majority is to filabusting to taking off and going on vacation. If you're suppose to be stating facts, state them all. They are all to blame why we can't get out of this mess. And if you are truly interested in getting us back on track you would have to admit that. What am I saying, I' sorry, I must have lost my head. I thought I was talking to someone with a common sense.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rich Eccleston

5:35 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Blaming Bush is getting old. Please put the blame where it belongs. On O.

free2speakup

5:02 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Sent the bill to Social Security Administration - they pay everything else out of our retirement fund!

Reply

Barbara Brown

5:29 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Sonia, Sonia, Sonia must you resort to name calling and insults? I asked for a LOGICAL response. Sorry to say you cannot provide one without trashing the person questioning your beliefs. And you belong to the party of TOLERANCE, such a shame. If you care to actually check facts through various websites, yes the Bush Campaign paid as many others on BOTH sides of the aisle. This is not about Bush, this is about Obama and what he has done in the past 4 years and what he will do in the future. His record is abysmal under any circumstance, his arrogance is beyond belief. If you believe in the proletariat system, I suggest you keep YOUR head in the sand. And before you suggest the koolaid, nothing on your side could make it that palatable to drink

Reply
Comment_arrow

Donna

6:07 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Amen! and btw, for all the citizens here that are offended when someone writes "Obama" instead of president... be honest now... did you just say "Bush" ?? I bet there was even worse names that went with that. I have to say, for a president that was going to bring this country together, wow, this is a pretty big divide! But thank God for America and the ability to express our opinions. Bless you all.

David Victory

5:55 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The disrespect shown to this President it unprecedented. It's ugly, and outrageous. If it's not Congressmen shouting at him during a presidential address, or "journalists" brazenly interrupting him during Rose Garden remarks, or any number of screwballs demanding to see his birth certificate 254364 times, it's this crap. Any other President ever been put through this "reimbursement" nonsense?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dennis Taylor

7:02 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I am giving someone who has used an executive order to seal all his records, a man who was a member of a gay bath house in Chicago in the 1990s called "Man's Country," and who used drugs in college and hung out with terrorists from the Weathernen group in Chicago more respect than he deserves. If Obama is willing to sully and smear the presidential seat with his fraudulent and noxious presence, his supporters cannot cry "foul" when others recognize what a travesty of a president we have. To honor the office is to reward the fraud and to empower him. Give us an honest president and he or she will have my respect, if not my support.

Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

8:58 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Dennis, can you get any more facts from Fox news, you are too funny...hmmm someone who's done or tried things in high school and admits it in his BOOK is not exactly anything to be ashamed of....oh Mitt Romney is so honest lol, changes sides like the wind on environment, health, abortion...I could go on and on, so I guess you are voting for Obama after huh! Please, when you accuse of gay bath houses, please attach your proof of research! lol

Comment_arrow

David Victory

6:24 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

@ Dennis

You offer no proof of any of you're preposterous claims, because you're a fraud. Stop making stuff up. Turn off Faux and Limbaugh. They're not helping you. Really.

Jimmy D

6:06 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Can this campaign be this stupid that they wold risk negative press for $20,000? Obviously the answer is yes............Aplles don't fall far from the tree. It took 3 1/2 years for people to strart figuring out how smart the Messiah really is.......

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

8:55 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Dear Jimmy, no risk, Exeter was begging to have the President come, just as Durham would to get Princess Dianna, Mother Theresa or any other famous person. Didn't hear anyone complain when other GOP presidents were campaigning....just because it's Obama...reminds me of the Tea Party, they didn't exist when Bush spent 3 trillion, but the second Obama won, they complained about the debt. Hypocrisy!

James Fitzgerald

6:26 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Game over! A donor is giving the town $20,000.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Atlant Schmidt

7:03 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Don't worry -- by tomorrow morning, all these folks will have the word on what new poutrage they should be complaining about.

Patch_comments_icon

Carolyn Dube

8:40 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I recommend people commenting on this story familiarize themselves with the Acceptable Use Policy section in our Terms of Use. We will continue to remove inappropriate comments from board and issue warnings as needed.

Here's the link to our Terms of Use (it's always available at the bottom of every page on Patch.) http://merrimack.patch.com/terms

Reply

Sue Mercier Vail

8:45 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Please close this article to comments.

Reply

Sue Mercier Vail

9:09 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Thank You, Sonia. It's good that this is settled for now. I'm going to repost:

Please close this article to comments. There are many remaining unacceptable comments. Allowing this hatred to be displayed here is simply breeding trouble. We have high profile visitors coming to NH this week. Let's help make it safe. All have had several hours to say what they need to say. I see senseless escalation and do not want any citizens or our officials or their representatives to come here in a climate of escalating hate.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

9:22 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Doesn't change the fact, as David Victory said above: "The disrespect shown to this President it unprecedented. It's ugly, and outrageous. If it's not Congressmen shouting at him during a presidential address, or "journalists" brazenly interrupting him during Rose Garden remarks, or any number of screwballs demanding to see his birth certificate 254364 times, it's this crap. Any other President ever been put through this "reimbursement" nonsense? " Reminds me of the Tea Party hypocrisy that they worried about the debt, yet didn't say a peep when Bush put us in debt by 3 trillion, the second Obama won, they all of a sudden cared...seriously?

Comment_arrow

Seamus Carty

8:14 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

"Reminds me of the Tea Party hypocrisy that they worried about the debt, yet didn't say a peep when Bush put us in debt by 3 trillion"

There were many conservatives that were disappointed in Bush and the Republicans' excessive spending from 2001 - 2009. That is what gave rise to the tea party in the first place...

Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

8:55 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

They were disappointed, but no one cried publicly or created such a movement until Obama was elected. Let's be real, who ever you are "FNA Seamus Carty", the Tea Party help hundreds of racist signs and had guns on their belts the minute Obama was looking like he may win! All of sudden, Obama is here and they get magically organized. Give me a break! There was hardly a peep when Bush ran up the debt way higher than Obama!

Patch_comments_icon

Marc Fortier

9:37 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Hey folks, I have to ask you to refrain from using expletives or making personal attacks against others, or your comments may be deleted and your commenting privileges revoked.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Keith F Thompson

11:20 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Marc and Carolyn- Your plees for civility are a sad commentary on the state of our nation. Taken as a whole, the lack of logic, the poor grammar and horrific spelling (even allowing for typos, of which any of us could be guilty), and the white hot hatred of the President expressed here is an embarrassment to our state and country.
I think the Patch organization is presented with some challenges and opportunities here. How do you have a thoughtful discussion with this kind of overwhelming hatred? Is this a matter of better controls, requiring people to use their real names for accountability? Is this an indication that a stricter posting policy is needed? Does your comments section have any value at all if it devolves to this?
In addition to a long look at posting policies, I would hope you would see the need for a good look at the roots of this problem. Why is the country so divided? Why has the rhetoric become so hateful? What are the sources of so many of the false claims made in these posts?
I think the Patch organization has some soul-searching to do. If you are purely a journalistic entity, what is the purpose of a comments section? (the same can be asked of the Telegraph and other media outlets) If you are some other form of community entity, what is your responsibility to keep your comments section civil and productive?
No matter how bad it gets, I always try to find a positive to take away. I must say, the comments here have left me needing a Tylenol and a break.

Comment_arrow

Seamus Carty

8:16 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

" If you are purely a journalistic entity, what is the purpose of a comments section? "

I guess that free speech is a problem when it is against one's point of view...

Comment_arrow

Keith F Thompson

1:09 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Seamus Carty-
Freedom of speech applies to the governments role. Your almost clever attempt to portray my comments in a poor light simply illustrate my point.
Without any personal responsibility displayed by the President's detractors, it falls to the owners of a private site to examine the value of a comments section. Perhaps they just need to adjust their policies or how one joins. But the veracity of the news doesn't change with opinion. So if it's news, why the opinion? If it's opinion, why not stronger controls?
Why are you against private enterprise?
Do you want to nationalize the Internet?
You must be a commie, then!

Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

9:40 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Marc,
Why don't you hold the Jim's on these patch pages to those same standards?
If he and others are allowed a free for all, the rest of us should be free to
retaliate in kind.

rick barasso

9:49 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I'm no magician, but watch this.
Could the conservatives with all their negative comments get specific on what he has done that is so terrible, to cause you to talk as you do about your President. Now here is the trick! You must only give us verifiable factual examples.
Watch this...... The silence from the right will be deafening.
Now second test for those that are still playing along...
Give us your list of the major accomplishments of Mitt Romney when he was Governor of Massachusetts and how his policies differ from those of the man you all want us to forget about, George Bush.
Let me apologize in advance for giving the conservatives a nearly impossible task.
TA DA

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dennis Taylor

11:10 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

All right, why are we buying 40% of our issued debt? Does that sound like a government that is honest and paying its way as it goes? Or, does it sound like one that has no problem ripping off dollar holders around the world and creating a hyperinflation that other people's children will have to live through? Is that enough noise from the right for you??? As far as mittens, it is only in our insane system that a man of so little personal character and accomplishments, backed by millions and a republican party willing to cheat Ron Paul could ever hope to rise to be the alternative to Obama. A public school history teacher, chosen at random would likely do a better job and have actual roots in the life enjoyed by the average American.

Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

7:59 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

I agree Rick. I dare any Republican to watch this in Romney's own words ON VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9njHHyRI7g FACTS only please!!
Flip flopped on health care, environment, abortion...the list goes on and on....he doesn't know if he's coming or going.

JML

9:56 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I would tell this bunch of idiots that he is welcome to come to the town, but not welcomed to use the high school or any town facilities if they are not willing to pay the extra fees incurred with a visit such as this. That's why the President has the Secret Service !!

Reply

jdlittlefish

10:04 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

John Dalton>>>>>>>>>>>

Absolutely . . .
If Obama showed up in my backyard .. .do I have to spend my money to protect him and pick up his cigarette buts . . .apparently . . .I do . . . .

Reply

ForThePeople

10:07 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

It's like an avalanche of bigotry has flooded this thread. This is the right wing, laid bare for all its ugliness. I am so disappointed.

Reject fear and loathing. Obama 2012.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dennis Taylor

11:14 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Hey, FTP, I have been anti-Obama. Please point out where I have specifically made a racist remark. Perhaps you are one of the people out there that see all anti-Obama opinions as racist? Can we get a copy of your anti-New Black Panthers rant when they illegally offered a bounty for the kidnap of Zimmerman? Does your anti-racist rhetoric only go one way???

Dennis Taylor

11:37 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Do your own research on the link between Man's Country and Obama. Just type in those words and look at the websites that pop up. Either these people are just Obama haters, or they may be on to something. You decide. For me, given the fact that Obama sealed his records on day one in office tells me he has something big to hide. Also, in his autobiography, he tells us he was a drug using homeless young man in New York. Such young men often become male prostitutes. Again, 1+1 equals somewhere in the neighborhood of two. To love Obama, one must constantly overlook all the likely negative possibilites to come up with the one he presents as true. For example, how does one become a Law Review president at Harvard by writing one article supporting legal abortion that, when footnotes were removed, was only 4 pages long? An Obama supporter has a ready excuse at hand, while a dispassionate person wonders how on earth such a person could even pass at Harvard, let alone be editor of the Review. Again common sense versus common dishonesty. For Obama's impressive 6 page article--remember writing 6 page papers in 5th grade, anyone--here is the link:http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12705.html

Reply

Sylvan Tieger

12:37 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

What is the savage in the oval office hiding that he is protecting Eric Holder?

How come the idiot in the oval office does not believe in DUE Process? Amazing how the savage orders people killed in other countries as Even Bush brought Saddam to trial and the savage uses drones to kill people.

He is guilty of war crimes, His wife's spending spree is a national disgrace We need to have accountability against the traitors in the congress and senate

Reply
Comment_arrow

Keith F Thompson

2:18 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Sylvan Teiger wrote-
"What is the savage in the oval office hiding that he is protecting Eric Holder?"
Please tell me again how the right wing is not racist. You keep letting it slip.
The President of the United States is African-American, from a mixed race marriage, from a working class family. He has an African American wife and two African American daughters. They live at the White House, with his African American mother in law. His Attorney General is African American. He has appointed two women to the Supreme Court, one Jewish and one Hispanic American. The Secretary of State is a woman, and the wife of the last President who had to live with this level of hatred.
All in all, people like you should have died of a stroke by now. It must be so hard for you, to wake up every day and realize all the above is true. No wonder you can't even summon the most basic human decency. That's just me being a typical liberal, having sympathy for another undeserving low-life.

Comment_arrow

Jack Jery

2:34 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

I'm applauding you, Sylvan ... your post hits the nail right over nits head.
EXCELLENT!

Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

2:44 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

"the savage"?
Your hood is showing....

Comment_arrow

TomRC

9:38 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

Maybe you forget how Reagan made a deal with Iran (the country that had kept Americans hostage for over a year) so he could sell illegal weapons to the Contra rebels, and a Marine colonel had to illegally shred and steal records and lie to Congress?

Hardy Har Har Har

8:10 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

Democrats were tested and their IQ came back negative

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sonia Prince

9:21 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

No children allowed on this site please.

Comment_arrow

Hardy Har Har Har

9:24 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

No Obamabots allowed on this site.

Comment_arrow

Brian St. Onge

10:39 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Don't need a test to realize that.

Hardy Har Har Har

8:46 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

99% of democrats are giving the rest a bad name.

Reply

Hardy Har Har Har

9:54 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

Democrats sit and think. Mostly sit

Reply

Sonia Prince

1:08 pm on Saturday, August 25, 2012

No one has time to respond to nonsense News Flash. This article is old news.

Reply

Leave a comment