'Local Control' Front and Center at Senate IB Hearing
Supporters, opponents of International Baccalaureate turn out in force.
More than 100 current and former Merrimack Valley and Bedford school district students, teachers and parents filled two rooms and the hallway outside to have their voice heard concerning House Bill 1403, which would effectively kill the International Baccalaureate (IB) program in New Hampshire.
Since Bedford and Merrimack Valley are the lone school districts to implement the program (Bedford offers IB courses in grades 11 and 12, and MV provides courses throughout its grades), the vast majority of those who spoke resided from those respective areas.
And while many of the dozens who spoke concentrated on the curriculum itself, the majority focused their comments on the ideal and meaning of "local control."
Even Sen. Ray White, R-District 9, - who said he felt ambushed by IB supporters at a school board meeting last month - concluded he would not support HB 1403 in its current state and urged his fellow senators to vote against it because he believes the legislation removes autonomy from individual school districts.
"I wasn't going to testify on this bill because I kind of consider myself an intellectual light weight when it comes to educational issues ... but I was urged to do so by many Bedford residents because this has kind of become the 'Bedford' bill, so to speak, to a lot of people," said White. "Like the rest of you senators, I represent many towns and I didn't hear one word of support for the IB curriculum from any of my towns except from Bedford, thus it would seem logical I would be in favor of HB 1403 ...
"But here's what it comes down to: if this committee believes it should be adopting a state-wide curriculum, then your choice should be obvious by the end of this hearing. You should support this bill," he continued. "But here's the problem. This should not be a discussion about the IB curriculum. In fact, I don't believe this committee or the state senate should be having curriculum discussions at all ... No matter how I feel about the IB curriculum decisions personally, I have always been consistent that curriculum decisions belong at the local level."
White spoke following Rep. Ralph Boehm - vice-chairman of the House Education Committee - who presented the bill at the hearing.
Boehm stressed the fact that IB is connected to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and noted payments and disputes involving IB are directed to Geneva, Switzerland, where IBO is headquartered. He also cited U.S. law which states no funds can be given to UNESCO.
Dave Murray, a Bedford parent who has students who have taken both IB and AP courses, said he opposes IB and supports HB 1403 as it currently stands.
"Really, I think my focus on the bill and why I support it is this concept of who controls what is going on in our schools. IB is the topic of the day, but it could be the Catholic Church or any other type of foreign organization, that the school board decides to sign us up for a program that's run or operated internationally. I think that's really something we need to look at across the state," said Murray, who noted while each district deserves a large measure of control, it's important to have some state and federally mandated guidelines in place to establish a standard for education throughout the U.S. and New Hampshire.
There were others, still, like BHS junior Michael Courtney, who pleaded with the committee to vote against the bill.
"Let's admit that the sole purpose of this hearing has nothing to do with the merits or criticisms of the IB program, but rather if the curriculum represents a threat to the sovereignty of New Hampshire," said Courtney. "If I may speak for my fellow classmates, it's safe to say we're here today because we believe in the IB program and all it it stands for ... what really worries me whether the act of the legislature in passing this bill into law represents a threat to the sovereignty of the local communities of new Hampshire after we have researched, scrutinized voted upon, implemented and reassessed our own school curriculum."
Dozens of supporters and opponents followed, offering similar sentiments, and an amendment was offered by the NH House Education Committee which essentially calls for a study committee on the issue.
The senate education committee will move into executive session to discuss the bill and likely pass down its recommendation on the bill, amended or not.
Bill Duncan
8:37 pm on Tuesday, May 1, 2012
Great, reliable report, Ryan, as always.
Katie Bell
9:00 am on Wednesday, May 2, 2012
The problem with IB student Michael Courtney's defense of IB, is his claim that it was "voted upon" by the Bedford community.
IB, a fringe, relativistic, globalist "programme", is almost always introduced into a public school system by a change-agent Superintendent and subsequently rubber-stamped by the BoE. In some cases, Superintendents have even attempted to circumvent their BoEs with applications (see Greenwich, CT and Stow, OH) Well aware of the nationwide controversy surrounding IB, rarely if ever is the REQUIRED feasibility study involving the community conducted. Papers are signed and checks are issued , all the while claiming what a "rigorous" preparation process the school engaged in to garner IB authorization.
Fact: There is no evidence of a single school in the U.S. ever being denied IB authorization ..... as long as the checks are good.
Fact: If objections arise and are voiced regarding IB in a community, IB objectors are bullied and harassed by IB supporters and children are used to defend the program. By doing so, IB can claim those who oppose IB are "attacking children".
I hope the Education Committee will consider an amendment which will allow current IB juniors to finish out the Diploma Programme in 2013 and that from this day forward, only private institutions of learning may purchase the IB product.
www.truthaboutib.com
H. D.
9:35 pm on Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Would you please quit it? You don't live in Bedford, you don't know how much time parents, teachers, administrators, School Board members, etc., put into researching this program... Please leave us in peace. I understand the IB program has its flaws, but in my opinion - as I've taken Honors, AP, and IB courses - IB is excellent.
Bedford voters indeed voted - several times! - on the implementation and continuance of IB at BHS.
And believe me, those who oppose IB are quite vocal and unafraid. I assure you.
And lastly - you declare "children are used to defend the program". If that includes high school students (as we technically are not adults) then I vehemently oppose that statement. Excuse me for asserting that I know my own mind, and am not easily indoctrinated, thank you very much. I know IB is flawed. Nothing is perfect. But its methods are far superior to AP. IB urges one to think and discover. AP drills facts.
I simply don't understand why you are so passionate about the death of IB.
ForThePeople
10:48 pm on Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Here's what it boils down to: IB teaches students the tools to think critically and how to find not only the answers, but the questions for issues in life. This is obviously anti-Republican, where they prey upon folks' ignorance:
http://news.yahoo.com/low-iq-conservative-beliefs-linked-prejudice-180403506.html
There are a lot of Republican parents that don't want their kids to know more than they do, have things they didn't have (like a college education, public school worked for them!), or have an independently acquired value system based upon how the kid feels about things.
All of the comments that you hear about this being from Europe (xenophobic much?), anti-globalization, or even worse- brainwashing!- are the shrill cries of Republicans losing their grip on students, for whom they would like nothing more than to remain uneducated and ignorant. It's the best way to get their vote.