Do you really agree that Romney is a better choice? That would make you pretty much an "ignoramus" yourself.

Of course he's running on deceit and lies, he doesn't have a record he can run on so it's all he has.

Even the comments here take one of two approaches, either like Caitlyn the propose "Do you really agree that Romney is a better choice?" which simply implies Romney might somehow be worse then what we have or like several others here who repeat the talking points of Obama ads which even the above article points out are false.

They are running on "what ifs" and lies because it's all they have.

If you want to see how someone treats women Obama has a record already and it's not a very good one:
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/14/obama-hold-on-sweetie/

So to answer Caitlyn's choice, while I didn't support Romney in the primary and I would put him near the bottom of the choices Republicans had to choose from, do I think he would be a better choice then Obama? Yes without a doubt.
When Obama has lead us to the bottom there isn't anywhere left to go but up.

@Richard Barnes you think that article downgrades President Obama on how he treats women? Now that's funny. First it was back in 2008 and he called to apologize. He has never to my knowledge been against women's rights like Romney is today in 2012. The only reason I can see why people do not like Obama is because of the color of his skin..even though no one who attacks him has admitted to this it's probably true. President Obama has more compassion and his interest is focused on the people and not the politics. He is a Community Organizer who puts people first and that's not how the Washington Politics works. Money, greed and power is what moves Washington. That's just the way it is..so how do we combat that?

Jane, he apologized after it made national news.

I also love how you jump right to playing the race card.
I'll give you plenty of reasons I dislike Obama and not a single one has anything to do with the color of his skin.
1) ObamaCare is the largest tax increase EVER passed in this country and the majority of it falls squarely on the middle class.
2) Obama called for the assassination of a US Citizen without due process as guaranteed by the 5th amendment
http://www.salon.com/2010/04/07/assassinations_2/
3) Obama not only broke his promise that he would eliminate the Patriot Act but extended it far beyond what Bush had already done allowing the government to now also spy on US Citizens.
4) The US Deficit under Obama with Democrats in control of both the house and Senate jumped from an average of $400 Billion a year as we saw under Bush while Republicans were in charge to $1.7 Trillion a year.
5) While publicly stating he was going to freeze the salaries of White House personal he turned around and authorized raises to 74% of the staff, most of whom where earning over $100k a year. And too boot the raises averaged three times the average increase of the private sector. And did the same for 54% of the staff the following year as well.
6) In his book he openly admitted to eating Dog.
7) He started his political career in the living room of a terrorist who murdered police.
Out of space - should I go on or do you still think its just about race?

Once again Jennifer Horn shows why she is a leader and obama is a divider and class warfare breeder, I personally haven't seen any of the dear leaders adds every time I see his face on TV I turn the channel . I here the cartoon network its more factual and truthful than any of obamas political adds

You're delusional. You have absolutely no idea of just what plan Obama is following. But I can guarantee you one thing..........if Obama should bere elected , you will not like the outcome at the end of his second term.

I guess if you hate American values then your ''lucky'' you have comrade obama

Women should pay for their own birth control products. That's not a health issue anymore than paying for a haircut is. Perhaps you feel so entitled that you think the government should pay for your haircuts and makeup too - with taxpayers dollars. I for one don't want my money being used to pay for abortions for women who don't know enough to use birth control measures or simply to keep their legs together.

Good on you, Caitlyn! I couldn't have said it better myself. Ms. Horn, step outside.

You are so right, Caitlyn! I agree completely. I can't believe the racists we have in NH!

Yes Anyone That's not a health issue anymore than paying for a haircut is. but what you are forgetting is that you got that haircut after the insurance company paid for your minoxidil so you could could grow that hair. You don't want to pay for bithe control but then you don't want to pay to support the babies that are born because you don't agree with welfair also. the only things conservatives care about is more money in their own pockets and everyone else be damned. You talk about love of country but all you love is money and self you don't care about the rest of your countrymen.

President Obama supports women and women's rights fully, and Romney does not. The Affordable Health Act now mandates full coverage of: many more health issues than were covered prior to passage of that act. He fully supported the Ledbetter Bill, which mandates equal pay for equal work regardless of gender. It was Neanderthal not to have that mandate in place for so very many years. President Obama has been very active in supporting women, and a wonderful father to two daughters. Candidate Romney supports restrictive and unequal legislation. A woman who votes for a candidate who feels that she ought to earn less than a man for the same job, is a fool. The choice is a no-brainer for any woman who is honest with herself.

Excuse me, Obama pays his female staff 20% less than men.

@ NF

That claim about pay disparity is utter nonsense. You've posted it before. It was a lie then. It's a lie now.

Women paid significantly less in Obama White House than their male counterparts
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2128513/Women-paid-significantly-Obama-White-House-male-counterparts.html

Obama White House Pays Women Less Than Men
http://nation.foxnews.com/president-obama/2012/04/11/war-obama-white-house-pays-women-less-men

Looks like David Victory is wrong again. I have never called you a liar David but you seem to be loose with that accusation. Change your last name to loser

you cant believe the racists we have here ...I cant believe the communists ,socialists and marxists we have here ...who always play the race card ...comrade sharpton is that you ?

Thank you, Jane! You found the link before I could :)

Wait a minute! Paternalistic???? You're thinking of W! He thought he could protect us or at least make us think he was protecting us. Obviously he was wrong!

Over 4 million Jobs have been created since President Barack Obama's polices went into effect. We lost 4.5 million under the same polices that Mitt Romney wants to go back to.

These Stats are offensive:
Number of Unemployed 12,700,000,000 , 12.7 million
Number of Long Term Unemployed 5,700,000,000, 5.7 million
Number of Underemployed 8,200,000,000,000 , 8.2 million

Current statistics per Bureau of Labor Statistcs
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm/

And making unemployment numbers smaller is better, right?

Pretending failure is a success is worse.

Pretending that stopping the loss of 4.5 million jobs and adding back 4 million can't be considered nothing short of a success.

www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/08/03/employment-situation-july

The Dems wish to create jobs.
www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/08/03/employment-situation-july

The repubs wish to destroy them. Now THAT is offensive.

www.thestand.org/2012/.../gop-blocks-bring-jobs-home-act-in-congr

Just once....just once.......would you make an attempt to post an intelligent sounding comment that isn't composed of DNC talking points, misinformation, distortions and outright lies. Your credibility on here is is at absolute zero.

Impossible.

The moniker you hide behind is an actual GOP talking point which makes your claim of my bias exceptionally hysterical.
I am posting Mitt Romney quotes, are you claiming that Mitt Romney is only talking in DNC talking points?
Your disconnect from reality is breathtaking.

And who are you to say that Jennifer lived a life of privilege or any woman lived a life of privilege unless you saw it yourself. Why is it there are those who believe that because a woman made the right choices for herself and was able to "dabble" in things not all women can afford or do she is a woman of privilege. Many, many women who choose to direct their path in a direction that will give them satisfaction with their life WORKED to get there, yet we are considered "women of privilege". Many women could enjoy advantages, they have to decide how badly they want it and how willing they are to work for it. It really does come down to choices for the majority, not always how you were raised, not who you marry, not even if you are college educated. It is how you choose.

More lame crap from Healy.

You are jealous of her lifestyle, mr Healey.

I didn't mean to imply that she is better off than me, just better off than a majority of American women.

Christine, lots of people work hard. Very few enjoy privilege. There's a reason for that.

Could I add forthepeople, That there is nothing wrong with taking advantage of your privilege. Its the denial that you have been blessed with gifts that not everyone has and your denial that you have a shared obligation to your community.
Use your gifts, succeed, but don't deny the advantages that got you where you are, and don't deny that those with lesser gifts work just as hard and long with lesser results.

Who is the lardo talking about obesity? Certainly no the First Lady. She's in better shape than most of the US. You guys really get creepy.

Fear, loathing and hate is spam

Why yes it is, news flash!

Down with fear, down with loathing, down with hating, that is what I say.

I don't think anyone did ask you. It's one of the most foolish statements I've ever read. If you took a second to think about it, you'd see it's self defense, which has to take priority.

I wish you had used your real name so that women everywhere had fair warning.

Woman are not stupid, and we clearly see that our President supports all gender equality and that the candidate Romney does not. We do know what's real and what's not real. We know that candidate Romney will decrease our rights and that President Obama will support them and in fact will support fairness in all forms. When I read the disrespectful, dishonest drivel that several posters on this thread spew, I so fervently do not want the world to be populated by those beliefs and those attitudes. Those sorry excuses for contributors foment hate and nothing more. We can tell the difference, and we do vote.

Arrogant politician that panders and lies. I believe you just described every major candidate for national election for at least my lifetime.

"Anyone but Obama" really means "Mitt Romney" so perhaps you should tell us more about Mr. Romney's humble campaign of truth.

Romney said the same thing, are you offended by him?

Corporate America is sitting on $3,000,000,000,000. They ARE doing fine. It's just not helping the little guy.

Mitt has flipped more than a crackhouse mattress.

A sampling of said flips can be found here: http://mittromneyflipflops.com/

WARNING: It's really funny!

When a Dem politician changes his opinion, he "evolves" and when a Repub politician changes his mind he "flips flop" -- got it

obama was against huge deficits befor he was for them
obama was against gay marriage befor he was for it
obama supported the military befor he gutted it with defence cuts
obama supported the DOMA befor he was against it
obama supported dont ask dont tell befor he was against it
obama was for transparency in govt befor he sealed all his records
obama was a muslim befor he was a christian
obama was for our space program befor he was against our space program
obama was for religious rights befor he was against them
obama was for jeremiah wright befor he was against jeremiah wright
obama was for smoking pot befor he was against smoking pot
obama was for snorting coke befor he was against snorting coke
obama was for Israel befor he was against Israel
obama was for the constitution befor he was against the constitution
obama was for upholding our laws befor he decided to uphold only the laws he wanted to

H.T.
Do you mean when Bush changed his position like the wind he was "evolving"
and when Kerry started learning facts about the Iraq war he was a "Flip flopper"?
Got it.

Anyone, male or female, supporting Barack Obama is more than simply wildly confused. They are naive and extremely gullible victims of the Smoke & Mirrors Show this arrogant liar has put on since 2007.

comrade dave speaks for all women !!!

actually ABO obamas whole life has been a smoke and mirrors show

@ ABO & Nützlicher idiot JIM

Neither one of you addressed the points in my post. You're both lightweights.

Who is Harrison Bounel???

NF all comrade obamas supporters are delusional.

From day one, Obama has been spewing deceit and lies with his Smoke & Mirrors Show. Only the gullible and politically naive support or believe anything this con artist says.

You are clearly upset because Obama will not be " Hortoned" or "Swift Boated."
I am glad to see that the Obama campaign is ON the offensive!

Why is Obama worse? Be specific. Don't give me "socialism" - that's a child's answer. You're an adult, right? Act like one. Answer my question.

Offensive to you because it hits the nail on the head. And thanks for the link.
The electorial map on the right looks good for Obama.
.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/24/obama-ads-you-didnt-build-that_n_1699661.html

@ NF

Why do you post links? It's because you want the reader to click on them and learn something, right?

Once again, YOU DIDN'T BOTHER TO DO IT YOURSELF!

"On July 13, Obama said, "There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen."

Obama was referring to the "American system" and "roads and bridges," not the business.

Nevertheless, Mitt Romney and Republicans have jumped on the line to paint the president as hostile to businesses. Romney has run with the line in recent stump speeches, and his campaign has aired ads featuring business owners."

So embarrassing. NF, I can understand why you hide behind a pseudonym.

so comrade, you denounce the ''anti-abortion religionists'' who have taken control of the republican party and embrace the communists,socialists and marxists who have taken control of the democrat party, where where you from before you moved to Salem, Russia ?

@ AbO

Preventing unwanted pregnancy benefits the entire country. It's worth it to the taxpayer to make contraceptives widely available. It's very, very cheap compared to the alternative.

@ Celia

Would you have your father's baby?

Paul Ryan believes that's your only option.
http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/politics-elections/243689-ryans-abortion-stance-could-widen-gender-gap-in-swing-states

What's wrong with you?

What was the debt when GWB took office?

Comrade hull, who are you here portraying today ? the evil rich business owner or the poor 99 %er looking for your ''fair share'' and ''social justice for all ''

It's crap. The Washington Free Beacon is a 6-month old blog started by right wing kids. Even if correct, it shows only the average pay - it does NOT compare, by gender, the pay for jobs of the same title.

From supply side to deregulation, from tax cuts for corporations that ship American jobs overseas to the race to the bottom, conservatism does not work. It’s not real conservatism, anyway. Real conservatism looks more like the Libertarian party. The brand of Republicans calling themselves fiscal conservatives today aren’t conservatives at all; they’re Corporatists, and their every word and act reveals this. Against extending unemployment benefits that add $30 Billion to the deficit, but for extending the Bush tax cuts that add nearly $1 Trillion to the deficit..every year. That’s right; if we ended the Bush tax cuts today, our actual deficit would be somewhere around $600 Billion, and all of the Bush years would have seen budget surplusses.

How’s that for conservative economics?

Man, you need to take Economics 101 and stop embarrassing yourself.

Not even close to amateur economics. Start with there is a 'Direct Relationship between Tax Rates and Growth Rate". The reason that Obama and democrats are failing on the growth side is NOBODY trust the fools not to raise taxes and redistribute money as they please. Oh yeah whomever votes for them gets the tax breaks.

facts ? this is your opinion , nothing more

The great feeling that comes with being a Tea Partier is that you don't have to take responsibility for anything. It's a religion upon itself with forgiveness built in. A basic premise of the TP movement is that whatever is wrong in America is someone else's fault. The ridiculous war in Iraq that virtually all these TP followers supported even after it was obvious that we had been lied to by the Administration is someone else's fault. The horrible economic policies of the Bush Administration that led us into bankruptcy, "Not my fault," says the TP follower. If you are a TP type, it's O. K. if you supported it then, but don't worry, you have no responsibility for the consequences now. You just blame that socialist president and you are forgiven, if not him, just be sure to blame someone.

Another great thing that comes with the Tea Party label is the right to ignore the truth and make up even the most preposterous scenario to support the Tea Party position. Go ahead. You can do it. Your programmer says it is O. K. You can say that the President is a Muslim even though everyone (including you) knows he is not. You can say that the Health Care Bill contains a provision for death panels even though it simply isn't now, and never was true. You can blame the economic collapse on liberals even though the economic policies you supported caused it. You can insist there is no separation of church and state in the Constitution or that there is no right to privacy. It's all O. K. because your programmer told you it was. Honesty is no longer important in the world of modern conservatives. All you have to give up is the right to think for yourself. After all, you've bought into the corporate, bi g-time religious and super wealthy fantasy that making them more powerful and richer will improve your life. Good luck!

said the OWS protester the shill as he defecates on police cars and wiggles his fingers in your face and refuses to move his plastic tarp tent he has been living in all summer at one of the OWS love-ins

Occupy Wall Street had more in common with the Boston Tea Party than today's Tea Party does. The real Boston Tea Party was a protest against huge corporate tax cuts for the British East India Company, the largest trans-national corporation then in existence. This corporate tax cut threatened to decimate small Colonial businesses by helping the BEIC pull a Wal-Mart against small entrepreneurial tea shops, and individuals began a revolt that kicked-off a series of events that ended in the creation of The United States of America.
They covered their faces, massed in the streets, and destroyed the property of a giant global corporation. Declaring an end to global trade run by the East India Company that was destroying local economies, this small, masked minority started a revolution with an act of rebellion later called the Boston Tea Party.
The Boston Tea Party resembled in many ways the growing modern-day protests against transnational corporations and small-town efforts to protect themselves from chain-store retailers or factory farms. The Tea Party's participants thought of themselves as protesters against the actions of the multinational East India Company.

Although schoolchildren are usually taught that the American Revolution was a rebellion against “taxation without representation,” akin to modern day conservative taxpayer revolts, in fact what led to the revolution was rage against a transnational corporation that, by the 1760s, dominated trade from China to India to the Caribbean, and controlled nearly all commerce to and from North America, with subsidies and special dispensation from the British crown.

A pamphlet was circulated through the colonies called The Alarm and signed by an enigmatic “Rusticus.” One issue made clear the feelings of colonial Americans about England's largest transnational corporation and its behavior around the world: “Their Conduct in Asia, for some Years past, has given simple Proof, how little they regard the Laws of Nations, the Rights, Liberties, or Lives of Men. They have levied War, excited Rebellions, dethroned lawful Princes, and sacrificed Millions for the Sake of Gain. The Revenues of Mighty Kingdoms have entered their Coffers. And these not being sufficient to glut their Avarice, they have, by the most unparalleled Barbarities, Extortions, and Monopolies, stripped the miserable Inhabitants of their Property, and reduced whole Provinces to Indigence and Ruin. Fifteen hundred Thousands, it is said, perished by Famine in one Year, not because the Earth denied its Fruits; but [because] this Company and their Servants engulfed all the Necessaries of Life, and set them at so high a Price that the poor could not purchase them.”

thats fine and there's nothing more offensive to me as a tax payer than having to pay for you women's health and not having a say in how MY money is spent, pay for it yourself and we will keep our opinions to ourselves, other wise TDB

Nützlicher idiot JIM,

Breitbart? That alone should invalidate this post.

But... http://factcheck.org/2012/08/obama-not-trying-to-curb-military-early-voting/

More lies from you, and your slippery crook of a candidate.

No link, no cred. If you don't provide backup, you're just lying.

Kind of like Mitt - he won't back up his claim that he pays 13% in taxes (which alone is outrageous, of course), we're just supposed to TRUST HIM!

No link, no cred. If you don't provide backup, you're just lying.

Kind of like Mitt - he won't back up his claim that he pays 13% in taxes (which alone is outrageous, of course), we're just supposed to TRUST HIM!

How would you know?

Well then, how would you know?