patching...
Update: Looking for breaking news or the hot stories of the day? Click here to subscribe to the free Concord NH Patch newsletters! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Contraception Policy Battle Ensues

GOP targets Obama on health care policy, Democrats launch "truth team" counter-offensive.

 

UPDATED

New Hampshire Democrats helped launch a grassroots-style war room today as a counter punch to Republican attacks on President Obama's health care policy involving contraceptive services.

President Obama's re-election supporters rolled out a "truth team" to rebut GOP charges that, among other things, the administration's policy oversteps fundamental rights to free exercise of religion. The Obama's front-line in New Hampshire includes House Democratic Leader Terie Norelli of Portsmouth, Rep. Candace Bouchard of Concord, Rep. Steve Shurtleff of Concord, Rep. Cindy Rosenwald of Nashua, state Sen. Lou D'Allesandro of Manchester, and former Senate President and Executive Councilor Beverly Hollingworth of Hampton.

Norelli said the president is focusing on making family planning more accessible to women by eliminating co-pays.

“Don’t let anyone fool you,” she said, “this is about birth control and nothing else. It’s about allowing women to make the decisions that are right for themselves and their families.”

Norelli, speaking during an Obama conference call Monday with reporters, added that the policy already exists in New Hampshire as part of a bipartisan bill passed in 1999.  “New Hampshire law prohibits insurance companies that cover prescriptions from denying contraceptive coverage,” Norelli said.

Bouchard called it a common sense idea and said 28 states already require employers to cover contraception.

“Birth control use is nearly universal in the united states, including among catholic women,” Bouchard said. “The president is committed to both respecting religious beliefs and increasing access to important preventative services.”

Hollingworth also said the issue had nothing to do with religion.

“As a Catholic woman," she said, "I believe the president’s policy is one that helps women get the health care they need and it’s about enabling women to make the personal family planning decisions that are right for them and their families.”

D'Allesandro, also on the conference call, lit into Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney.

“Romney’s been caught spreading mistruths about the president on almost every issue and misleading about his own record," D'Allesandro said. "For example, while Mitt Romney has attacked President Obama’s push to give more women access to family planning as an assault on religion, as Massachusetts governor, Romney was largely silent about a state law that required virtually the same contraceptive coverage.”

The Obama For America campaign is taking its message to several websites: Keepinghisword.com, KeepingGOPhonest.com, and Attackwatch.com – all part of BarackObama.com/truthteam, which the Democrats said would be called into action as issues arise. The New Hampshire "truth team" is part of a national effort.

The Obama "truth team" roll-out was coordinated in advance of a news conference in Concord this afternoon, at which time House GOP leaders were to talk about House Resolution 29, which would call on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services "to cease its unconstitutional course of action, and to rescind this rule immediately; ..."

House Speaker Bill O'Brien, R-Mont Vernon, and House Majority Leader D.J. Bettencourt, R-Salem, are among the sponsors of the resolution.

The full wording of HR 29 can be read here.

Bettencourt, in prepared remarks he delivered at the news conference Monday, said the resolution was needed to “push back” against part of “Obamacare.” Here is a copy of his remarks:

“As with so much of Obamacare, it is free citizens, churches and companies that are being coerced into a particular course of action when they were previously free to chose, and in this circumstance it is the Federal Government that is doing the imposing.  

It is incredibly disappointing to see the Obama Administration is distracted from focusing on our fragile economy and is instead involving itself in social issues which the Federal Government has no business. It was interesting to hear the President’s Chief of Staff yesterday morning on “Meet the Press” roll out a straw man argument by saying that because some Catholic institutions receive government funds through Medicare and Medicaid they should therefore be subject to these mandates.

That argument is not just irrelevant to the point at issue, but it is also false. Dollars from Washington do not each carry a rider noting that their transmission deprives recipients of all Constitutional protections. If they did, retired Americans could be politically silenced by their Social Security checks. Such a scenario is of course ridiculous, so why are hospitals and religious institutions any different.

Moreover, no matter how hard the administration tries to spin the “compromises” they released late last week, the reality is that it is merely a symbolically tweaked plan that moves forward with trampling Americans’ religious liberties while pretending to accommodate them. In truth, nothing of substance has changed from the original announcement that religious employers will be forced to provide services they find morally objectionable.

That is wrong and we must stand up to the heavy handedness of the White House. The American people are guaranteed the right to religious liberty by the First Amendment. That means protecting both the rights of religious institutions and those of individual citizens.

It’s a shame that the Bishop need to take important time away from the dioceses to defend doctrines of the Catholic faith from this unprovoked attack by the Obama administration. That means protecting both the rights of religious institutions and those of individual citizens.

It’s a shame that the Bishop need to take important time away from the dioceses to defend doctrines of the Catholic faith from this unprovoked attack by the Obama administration.

But we are proud to stand united in defense of the First Amendment and New Hampshire’s long and proud history of religious tolerance."

 

Related Topics: Affordability Care Act, Birth Control, Health Care Reform, President Obama, and Religious Freedom

Rick Watrous

2:10 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012

The Republican leadership's introduction of House Resolution 29--which attempts to tell the US Government what to do regarding contraception--will be a huge waste of time and energy for the NH House. Such resolutions are routinely ignored, no matter who is in power in Wash. DC.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Wendy James

8:02 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012

There are so many medications that fall into the class of contraceptives that I don't think they realize. My teenage daughter is on one such med to regulate her cycle and it's a pretty expensive med but without it she'd be stuck in bed for a week.

Edward Dunsel

2:39 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012

It won;t be ignored by the voters of New hampshrie who are not looking for the state to ssend its women screaming headlong into the 17th century like OBrien and Bettencourt are. They are little more than a pair of matched Neanderthals whose scorn for women probably masks some serious personal issues.

Reply

NH Voter

3:14 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012

The dems are tyrants and need to be voted out of office. There is not a single dem on the national stage that is not feverishly working to destroy the country. They are all traitors.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jan Schmidt

5:12 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012

too much TV will do that to you...

Comment_arrow

Wendy James

8:00 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012

That's a pretty ridiculous comment to make NH Voter

Comment_arrow

David Victory

10:33 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012

How ridiculous. Any examples of tyranny and/or destruction on the part of the Dems you'd care to share?

Comment_arrow

ForThePeople

8:06 am on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Look at all of those references, well-defined points, and supported statements by NH voter.

Do Republicans have anything other than fear and loathing? This president has tried to create jobs by investing in American infrastructure, healthcare to take care of everyone, invested in education, ended a war (and various strategic victories), and tried to close tax loopholes for the extremely wealthy.

In the meantime, the real tyrants (the Republican congressmen) have blocked multiple bills to balance the budget, tried to repeal healthcare, want to start a war with Iran, completely uninterested in education, and tell people that if they work for a religious institution they are out of luck for getting their birth control(telling people how to live their life).

Who is the real tyrant?

Please take note, this is how you form an idea and support it. You give a hypothesis, some supporting statements on both sides of the issue, and a conclusion.

Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

2:21 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

LOL LOL LOL LOL !!!!!!! Have you been listening to your nutcase buddies
Beck,Hannity and Limbaugh again? You are ludicrous, But thanks for the laugh!

Rick

4:29 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012

It appears that the Speaker and his gang are following the lead of Senator Santorum.
Watch out ladies, Santorum and O'Brien will have you back to the days when you were kept barefoot and pregnant.

Reply

Jan Schmidt

5:17 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012

and some women will still vote for them....

Reply

Esteban Vilahu

5:22 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012

I wonder why President Obama used THIS time to introduce the new health care provision. After all, he had another full year before the provision becomes effective.

In any case, his move is helping Santorum in his race for the GOP nomination. Coincidence or strategic move?

Reply

Don Duston

5:57 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012

Government should be involved in a constipation battle not a contraception battle.

Reply

Jan Schmidt

7:49 am on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Contraception has zip to do with anyone except the person who uses it.

Its time to start recognizing who is waging the war against woman and identify them to the voters as 1) extremists and 2) those who use these extremists to advance their political hold on us.

A guy in a dress that tells women (whom he must never touch) that its immoral to plan for her children is odd, that people believe this and force it on others as well is insane.

Reply

Edward Dunsel

8:03 am on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Rep. Steve King (R-IA) likened birth control to abortion Friday on MSNBC and said he isn’t convinced contraception helps prevent pregnancies.

This is a Republican in the US House of Representatives. I'll bet his constitutents are very proud of him.

Reply

ForThePeople

6:38 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0kJHQpvgB8

This is quite relevant to the issue, even many years later. Wait till you get home to enjoy this one.

Reply

Matt Publicover

8:36 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Wow, this is really too bad. This is an interesting and rather important topic, but the opportunity to intelligently discuss it has been squandered by mindless name-calling.
What I find interesting about the issue is the fact that NO right in the constitution is unlimited, and government (well, usually the courts) has to weigh who suffers the greatest harm when one person's right imposes undue hardship on another. For example, "freedom of association" is important, but it does not supercede the right of people of any race to buy a home in a neighborhood of their choice. The harm done to the minorities, in this case, would be greater than the harm done to those who would want to exclude them. In the health care case, is the financial and practical harm done to the women who would be denied contraceptive coverage greater than the spiritual harm done to the church that has to include that coverage in the health plans it offers its employees in secular jobs?
Perhaps there is room for compromise. Could the Catholic organizations be permitted to offer plans without contraceptive coverage as long as they provided a stipend of equal monetary value to any employee wishing to buy a private plan that does include contraceptive coverage? There's just too much digging in of heels these days, on both sides.

Reply

Debra Woodward

8:02 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Have you noticed it is only MALE talking heads (bishops and GOP politicians) sceaming about the horror of women’s access to birth control? This is not something new--28 states already have this similar rule for Catholic-run hospitals and colleges, and nobody screamed about this when the Bush administration enforced a similar rule. And ask your friends who are Catholics--like most Americans, they support contraceptive coverage and are against the religion exemption. If you impose your religious beliefs on your employees, and the government allows you to do so, that's more or less establishing religion. You have the right to practice your faith. You don't have the right to infringe on someone's right not to, especially if you receive money from the federal government, like Catholic University.

Reply

Leave a comment